The Updated X2 3800+ Overclocking Thread ...

A.N.Other · 16 Jun 2006 at 23:50

UPDATED TABLE to here

Thanks for your input, people. Keep 'em coming.

A.N.Other · 17 Jun 2006 at 16:48

I could add a column for stability, but I don't know who at the top was stable and who wasn't, as well slightly further down the list. Would people prefer to see only the stable clocks (which would probably be more useful) or to have the column for stability (which allows people's e-penises to grow)?

I'm not overly bothered about screenshots tbh. You can link to them, but I don't want a load of massive screenies clogging up the thread. I think it just simpler if it's taken on trust for the most part, although people doing the suicide shots are welcome to give evidence if they want.

Thoughts and opinions?

A.N.Other · 17 Jun 2006 at 17:30

OK, I'll just highlight in red those that aren't stable. That's probably easiest. Although let it be known that I'm making guesses here, so if I put you as unstable incorrectly, poke me and I'll change it.

I've also knocked a few people out of the table because I hardly had any of their details - people have had quite long enough by now to fill me in :rolleyes:

! If you've been dropped, you know what to do.

UPDATED TABLE to here, anyway.

A.N.Other · 17 Jun 2006 at 17:40

I'll leave you as you are in the table for now then. Update me when you're done.

A.N.Other · 19 Jun 2006 at 17:27

utajoker said:
hmm perhaps you could add another colomn to the table with maybe a superpi score then u can see how much an over clock improves the time, i for sure would like to no what 2.6 gets or high , to compare to mine

but, just s suggestion

I like the idea, but it would be too hard to actually get the information really. Most of the data in the table was compiled from the other 3800+ thread. To actually get people to post (and some have left / been banned anyway) all their Pi times would be a mission. That's quite apart from the RAM speed and timings etc.

However, this has been mentioned before, so we'll see what other people say

A.N.Other · 22 Jun 2006 at 19:18

Bones said:
Gonna test full stability tomorow, i noticed that everyone over 2.5ghz is running on 3x HT, is it ok to be running on 4x still?

You should be running at 3x HT Multi now...

FSB x HT Multi <= 1000

... as a rule

UPDATED TABLE

A.N.Other · 22 Jun 2006 at 20:10

I'll put it in later on - going for a swim. I take it this is to be highlighted red?

A.N.Other · 22 Jun 2006 at 23:10

Bigstan said:
F@H is a much tougher test of stability than Prime imho.

Natrually! F@H is best for everything. Not that I condone using F@H for testing (and you should NOT be submitting any results obtained), but anyone reading this should be folding for Team 10. See sig.

@ weescott ... I believe you've changed your board from what I had you down with, so I've left it out in this update. Looking forward to seeing how far you / you maniacs can push that CPU

UPDATED TABLE

A.N.Other · 27 Jul 2006 at 14:37

Thanks for your input Cal_G!

TABLE UPDATED

Some people have said that steppings would be a useful addition to the table. That's fine by me - post them and I'll stick them in another column.

A.N.Other · 30 Jul 2006 at 01:33

UPDATED TABLE

I've put in a new column for steppings and gone through this thread to find all of those posted. It would be great if people in the table who know their steppings could post them so that I can add them to the table. As normal, if you're new, just post your details and I'll add you to the list.

A.N.Other · 30 Jul 2006 at 11:57

sablabra said:
Great work, how did you know all this about me?

sablabra said:
Ok, here's my stable clock(seems stable, I've ran 12 hours dual prime95 once)

2800mhz-htt 280-ram 200-timings 2-3-2-5, ht 3x- vcore 1.55V- custom watercooling- manchester core- DFI sli-dr expert

You'd already posted your details :confused:

. Though if you prefer, it's because I'm psychic :cool:

!

Anyway, I'll leave your stepping out for the minute, unless you can confirm it. I'll update your RAM speed later on

A.N.Other · 30 Jul 2006 at 12:46

Good stuff. I'll make a table update later on today. Anybody else?

A.N.Other · 31 Jul 2006 at 00:18

TABLE UPDATE

Done up to here. Still looking for steppings from everyone in the table

A.N.Other · 1 Aug 2006 at 00:31

UPDATED TABLE

Thanks for your input dc2006

That's some nice work.

A.N.Other · 2 Aug 2006 at 01:52

Nice work, cuscus97 ... an impressive clock. I'll put you into the table tomorrow

@ Matt
Have a look here for recent steppings coming from OcUK. Just a thread I saw floating about.
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=17605182

A.N.Other · 2 Aug 2006 at 12:01

TABLE UPDATE

Cuscus97 ... I'm looking to get a water setup in about a month. Probably a 120.3, like that setup you've posted. I know you don't have it any more but can you remember the temps you were getting with it? Also, what did you run the CPU at 24/7? Thanks!

A.N.Other · 3 Aug 2006 at 15:09

Foehammer2003 said:
lol er thought it wasnt right, got a pic of it when i bought it you see cant quite make it out lol, if i post a link to the pic from my site can you have a look and let me know? i was just zooming in from Windows pic viewer!

That would be 05. The first two are the production year (05 = 2005) and the second two are the week (here, its 38).

I'll make an update later on. Thanks for the input everyone!

A.N.Other · 4 Aug 2006 at 01:12

TABLE UPDATED

Many thanks to all the new comers and people with their steppings!

There are 67 people in the table now :eek:

- I never realised it would be so successful!

doomsoldier said:
Great table, really useful when clocking.

Thanks dude! That's what I did it for, so I'm glad it's appreciated.

A.N.Other · 17 Aug 2006 at 23:59

Sorry guys - I've been away for a week, so no updates

Will update the table tomorrow some time.

A.N.Other · 19 Aug 2006 at 17:14

TABLE UPDATED

Well done to theboyrob ... straight in at number 9. Nice going!

I'm still looking for everybody's steppings, as well as clocks from new people