• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Poll: The Vega Review Thread.

What do we think about Vega?

  • What has AMD been doing for the past 1-2 years?

  • It consumes how many watts and is how loud!!!

  • It is not that bad.

  • Want to buy but put off by pricing and warranty.

  • I will be buying one for sure (I own a Freesync monitor so have little choice).

  • Better red than dead.


Results are only viewable after voting.
I don't want to run this thread completley off topic by getting drawn into your 'the same arguments' with me over and over.... i don't need to. The slide speaks for its self.

Go troll me in by Email or something, it will get redirected as spam. leave the rest of the forum out of it.
Ryzen doesn't have better IPC than Skylake tho does it. Nobody else has made that claim.

Remember they achieved something like +45% better IPC than Bulldozer, which brought it up to Haswell levels? Or something like it.

Your 30 game average doesn't prove anything about IPC. You'd need specific single-threaded tests to prove IPC claims. The graphs do speak for themselves, but they aren't saying anything about IPC at all.
 
has ended civil between me and kyle ;) I thanked him for taking the time to reply to me, which no one else has done.

He is adamant he is right, and has suggested if we wait 2 weeks something will happen to prove he is right.

A video has popped up on linus tech tips, jay2cents was on there as well, they had a rant against AMD and said they didnt like been made fools of in terms of the value aspect of their reviews, but nothing much more of substance said. In the same video they also said they now consider rx vega 64 of no value to gamers but only if you want to use the compute power (miners).
 
Last edited:
Ryzen doesn't have better IPC than Skylake tho does it. Nobody else has made that claim.

Remember they achieved something like +45% better IPC than Bulldozer, which brought it up to Haswell levels? Or something like it.

Your 30 game average doesn't prove anything about IPC. You'd need specific single-threaded tests to prove IPC claims. The graphs do speak for themselves, but they aren't saying anything about IPC at all.

52% over Excavator, Excavator has higher IPC than Piledriver, Piledriver 'all be it slight' has better IPC than Bulldozer, who knows what the IPC is over Bulldozer but my old FX-9590 score 110 Points @ 4.7Ghz ST Cinebench, Ryzen scores 160 at 4Ghz, so what's that? about 65%?

And, to address your other point, if you have one 6 core CPU running at 4Ghz matching another 6 core CPU running at 4.7Ghz then the 4Ghz CPU is doing more work per clock cycle, the definition of IPC, Instructions Per Clock.

My i5 4690K gets about 180 at 4.6Ghz. that's less IPC than Ryzen, a good chunk less.
 
AMD have probably made the biggest botched release of any graphics card in history but somehow they have manage to get away with it.
They increase the RRP by $100 just a few minutes after launch. Some underhand sales practice right here, I
I've just seen this. Funny how few have spoken of it here?

Its very disingenuous of AMD. Is this type of price reductions not illegal here in Europe. They said RRP of $499 and $599 but really it was a VERY LIMITED stock discount to their best distributors/shops and then increase or the real RRP is the price to $599 - $699. Very sneaky and dishonest, but did they expect people not to notice?
 
160 to 180 is 12.5% difference in score, your i5 is running a 15% higher clock speed.

That's 2.5% better IPC for Ryzen.

Obviously, that's just rough, and only using the figures you're giving.

Ryzen is around Haswell IPC, possibly higher. But Haswell has better for for core given the clocks.
 
Its very disingenuous of AMD. Is this type of price reductions not illegal here in Europe. They said RRP of $499 and $599 but really it was a VERY LIMITED stock discount to their best distributors/shops and then increase or the real RRP is the price to $599 - $699. Very sneaky and dishonest, but did they expect people not to notice?

There is no doubt these GPU's are over priced and just not upto snuff, too little too late and they do use too much power for gaming.

All that ^^^^ and yes it was dishonest of AMD not to be completely upfront about the real cost of these GPU's, but some people are calling them lairs without explaining how they got to that conclusion, and as has been said here some are calling Gibbo out what they claim was dishonest, Gibbo said right from the start these prices were introductory and would go up, he did say that, so AMD must have told him this....
 
Knock yourself out, the point of the huge written articles is they show a lot of detail: http://hexus.net/tech/reviews/graphics/108889-amd-radeon-rx-vega-64-radeon-rx-vega-56/

Thats one game at one resolution, there are others of both.

Come to that there's about half a dozen of these big write ups in english to look at.

hahaha-beautiful-o.gif


Hexus isn't that much more trustworthy than wccftech.

Just seems odd you decided to post the worst benchmark they had to get your point across.
 
Its ironic, AMD have lost the architecture war with nVidia, but they are kicking Intel's ass.

That's because Intel had just stopped innovating lately whilst NVIDIA isn't standing still which makes it difficult for AMD to catch NVIDIA. The 1080ti is just a stupidly fast card.NVIDIA knocked it out of the park with that card.
 

Remember how AMD die-hards were insisting the two cards were going to be incomparable come release?

Nevertheless, as Luke said on the WAN show, these new prices might not even matter because 'AMD has a very aggressive, very dedicated fanbase'. There's a large section of AMD fans who are incredibly fanatical and love to think AMD = good while everyone else = evil. The reality is products speak for themselves and the market as a whole paints a true picture of where rational consumers stand. AMD die-hards love to moan about how AMD are never given a fair shake and suffer because of poor marketing etc. The truth is they'll gain market share back with Ryzen. Why? Because they're good CPUs. That's the bottom line. Marketing and brand power absolutely matter but the first and most important thing is the product itself.
 
That's because Intel had just stopped innovating lately whilst NVIDIA isn't standing still which makes it difficult for AMD to catch NVIDIA. The 1080ti is just a stupidly fast card.NVIDIA knocked it out of the park with that card.

They didn't need to, in CPU's AMD have been no where since the Phenom II days, that's a long time.

nVidia upto a point have had to deal with an AMD that was competitive, at least up-until Maxwell, now tho.....
 
Remember how AMD die-hards were insisting the two cards were going to be incomparable come release?

Nevertheless, as Luke said on the WAN show, these new prices might not even matter because 'AMD has a very aggressive, very dedicated fanbase'. There's a large section of AMD fans who are incredibly fanatical and love to think AMD = good while everyone else = evil. The reality is products speak for themselves and the market as a whole paints a true picture of where rational consumers stand. AMD die-hards love to moan about how AMD are never given a fair shake and suffer because of poor marketing etc. The truth is they'll gain market share back with Ryzen. Why? Because they're good CPUs. That's the bottom line. Marketing and brand power absolutely matter but the first and most important thing is the product itself.


He's wrong about that and IMO an idiot to say it, if AMD's fan base was all that AMD wouldn't be in the penniless position they are now in.

Quite the opposite is true. AMD's fan base is insignificant. Inconsequential.
 
Its very disingenuous of AMD. Is this type of price reductions not illegal here in Europe. They said RRP of $499 and $599 but really it was a VERY LIMITED stock discount to their best distributors/shops and then increase or the real RRP is the price to $599 - $699. Very sneaky and dishonest, but did they expect people not to notice?
AMD did a statement saying the RRP is 499$, and that they cannot control the price hike due to shortage.
 
Back
Top Bottom