Apologies meant to say 'the' issue as opposed to 'your'. Simply meaning that almost 50% being 1/10 suggests obvious review bombing as other posters had denied. My bad.
After a certain amount of time RT will do averaged scores or something similar for Audience figures where they take into account review bombs or an influx of 10/10 scores - they did the same for She Hulk for example that ended up with more 10/10 scores than 1/10 scores.No probs!
Yeah that was some definite review bombing going on! I usually ignore any 1/10 & 10/10 scores for that same reason as I find that then gives you a more accurate reviewer score without all the guff.
No, your original point was that the show was trash and review bombing was just an excuse which have both been proved wrong. It is a 5/10 show so average and the review bombing is very clearAfter a certain amount of time RT will do averaged scores or something similar for Audience figures where they take into account review bombs or an influx of 10/10 scores - they did the same for She Hulk for example that ended up with more 10/10 scores than 1/10 scores.
My original point was that the critics are giving Blood Origin crappy scores
You were the one that brought up review bombing? I mean obviously you decided to ignore (and continue to ignore) the terrible critic reviews. Generally when critics'and audiences both come to a consensus then yes the show is trash by every metricNo, your original point was that the show was trash and review bombing was just an excuse which have both been proved wrong. It is a 5/10 show so average and the review bombing is very clear
Have to admit, I tend to stay out of the low brow arguments on here and have gone far beyond my usual tolerance of people trying to save face but as per my previous post. 5/10 is average not trash, actually an average of 5.3 is above average if you want to be pedantic and I just stated that the show was bombed within 5 minutes of it being out, meaning people hadn't actually watched it, which I also doubt you have which you said was an excuse. Again it isn't great but it's perfectly fine throwaway entertainment, the fight scenes in particular look like a lot of effort was put into them. And just for the sarcasm/I'm an internet antagonist here you go.....You were the one that brought up review bombing? I mean obviously you decided to ignore (and continue to ignore) the terrible critic reviews. Generally when critics'and audiences both come to a consensus then yes the show is trash by every metric
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/the_witcher_blood_origin/s01 and click see score details.Honest question, where are you getting an average of 5/10 from? The current critic score on rt is 38% or 3.8/10.
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/the_witcher_blood_origin/s01 and click see score details.
You didn't click Score Details did you? Again, i'm not saying its a brilliant show but the whole point of the discussion had so far is that is was review bombed.36% for critics or 9% for audience.
There are clearly some people who really liked the show. The Guardian, IGN and comicbook.com gave it largely positive reviews.
I wasn't one of them. I would give it a 3/10.
Imagine the Fellowship from The Lord of the Rings, except most of the cast is relegated to the role of "plot device". Then chuck in Jaffar (either the 1992 version, or the one from the local panto) and evil-Jasmine as the antagonists. The world is saved from these dastardly scoundrels by a deformed Grey Hulk. Except it isn't saved - the Wizards (who we know precious little about, as they received minimal attention from the writers) finally had their moment, the sole reason for their continued existence in the show. And it turned out they made a huge error and doomed the world instead.