I'd personally say that, recent generations are too soft and far too stupid for the world's growing complexities.
Needs a good pruning.
I'd personally say that, recent generations are too soft and far too stupid for the world's growing complexities.
Needs a good pruning.
So many workers have turned their backs on the trade union movement in the last twenty five years and now many of the rights the workers gained have either been eroded or gone altogether. What's the saying - divide and conquer. The present generation thought they were middle class and didn't need unions and now look where they are. The UK is the easiest place in Western Europe to get rid of staff.
I'm only glad I'm at the end of my working career and not in the position of younger workers. Having said that I went on trade union marches when I was young and sacrificed a lot of pay in an effort to improve the workers lot.
I think we'll see unions (or similar collectivist movements) increasingly coming back into vogue.
Don't be too pessimistic![]()
![]()
http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/...s-wages-just-bad-property-inflation-been.html
Yep. I was just stating few things that I know of from my knowledge. Don't really have any experience with this stuff.
The difference between the two lines represents direct theft of wealth from my generation yet to buy houses to the previous generation.
Direct Theft? A bit strong dont you think?
People sold houses for prices other people were prepared to pay (banks enabling this through poor lending practices). Are you saying that you would have sold your house for less than you could have made had you been in the situation?
Too many gender label obsessed Tumblr freaks and Instagram whores these days. Growing up with a little brother, I get to see it all unfortunately.
Direct Theft? A bit strong dont you think?
People sold houses for prices other people were prepared to pay (banks enabling this through poor lending practices). Are you saying that you would have sold your house for less than you could have made had you been in the situation?
The difference between the two lines represents direct theft of wealth from my generation yet to buy houses to the previous generation.
To reply to OP, the same group who complain that the youth don't have fire in their bellies are probably the same group that condemned Occupy London, the anti-fracking protestors, London riots, etc as hooligans, rabble rousers, and all the other descriptions that were applied to them when they were younger.
If you are looking for more of the same, I would say, be careful what you wish for...
I wouldn't agree that it's direct theft, but the "you wouldn't have done any different" argument is a bit hollow.
Presumably those people who subscribe to that philosophy would also be okay if the younger generation voted for tax cuts to be funded from pension cuts, higher taxation of private pensions, and the removal of winter fuel allowance.
The people "in charge" are not the 16-25 year olds (in any economic or electoral sense), and if there is a problem with the "youths" via either poor policy or poor parenting... well... should look at the generation raising them.
A few of the chaps down my local were having a chat the other night, you know how it is, putting the world to rights etc.
One of the contributors was complaining about today's younger generation in the West not having any fire in their bellies the way we did in our younger days.
I asked him what he meant by that statement. He said well think back to the sixties and seventies and even the fifties. There were protests almost every weekend about one thing or the other. There was CND with Ban the Bomb, Greenham Common, Workers Rights, world poverty, you name it and the young were protesting about it.
This drew more people into the conversation wth many agreeing. A few remarked that although probably an over generalisation today's young people appeared to be more insular and self-obssessed, more concerned with getting material things like the latest iPhone, clothes, other gadgets etc. rather than having a social concience. Many would prefer to play the latest computer game than take to the streets in an effort to change anything.
What do others think - did this group have a point?
I have to agree to some extent. Today's generation of younger people have been indulged and ruined by their parents.
and their parents got ruined by their parents and so on.