Again, I'll believe it when I see it, it's just a cycle of off shoring, on-shoring and now adding LLMs into the mix - all these gung-ho big shots saying they'll get rid of all developers are already trying it and failing etc.
I'll worry when a PMO can write a detailed brief and scenarios and 'AI' can do something which works, meets goals and isn't a miss-mash of code a 5 year old could write. It's nothing to do with 'AI' being better, it's big corps trying to sell AI as it's the buzzword and they want to make their shareholders richer.
Just like self-service tills were supposed to make checkout people extinct and self-driving was going to make HGV Drivers extinct I still see a lot of those around.
What I think we'll see is less open-ness and more things privatised in terms of access so that LLMs can't scrape things. That and AI is mega-expensive, and all of the big AI superpowers will need to start making profit at some point.
Mind you some stuff the next generation of AI is going to be crazy - I've been spending far too much time playing about with Suno AI music generation, despite the flaws it is also possible of some really advanced stuff and the next major iteration of it will be something else. End of the day though you still need a human curation of the end product and I doubt any generation will ever be better than if a human took the same thing and remade it from scratch using it as a basis.
This took all of a few seconds to put together using AI