Caporegime
- Joined
- 11 Mar 2005
- Posts
- 32,221
- Location
- Leafy Cheshire
Amber had a violent upbringing, so perhaps she just hates men.
Poll: This Johnny Depp Stuff
- Thread starter Dirk Diggler
- Start date
Amber had a violent upbringing, so perhaps she just hates men.
What about all his other relationships for the multiple decades who have said he was never abusive towards them? why would it start with Amber? hes always been described as a chill dude, yes he substance abuses but it doesn't go beyond that.
They have shown ZERO evidence whatsoever for any of the accusations apart from the verbal abuse (which was mutual)
That's possible yes.
Maybe she was the one that finally triggered him. But I suppose they both could have been violent towards each other.
It is irrelevant what she says without evidence. Turds team have provided nothing apart from verbal abuse (agreed that it was mutual), while we have physical, verbal and testimonial evidence she physically assaulted him on multiple occasions along with being manipulative. We would have seen something by now if they had anything on him apart from Ambers word. If this was the other way around and they had Depp on a voice recording admitting to assaulting her, he would be in jail, while she remains free even though she admitted it.
Everything she has said since she took the stand should be taken with many grains of salt until proven as its all just a fabricated story so far very out of character for Mr Depp from the multiple testimonies from past relationships where he showed no sign of aggression. She was even called out about lying about the make-up she used to cover bruises etc but that for some reason has been swept under the rug.
If she wins this without providing anything apart from words from her mouth...well...well done to the legal system.
Last edited:
But where in the hours and hours of recordings she made was there any of it when he was hitting her or even him admitting he hit her? There are recordings of her admitting she hit him but why not the other way around?
Where in the hours of witness testimony is there anyone who says they witnessed him hitting her or even having marks in her face after the alleged events? Yet there are witnesses who saw her hit him and throw things at him. Why not the other way around?
Where are previous partners saying he was abusive? We know she hit at least one previous partner. Why not the other way around?
Soldato
- Joined
- 17 Aug 2003
- Posts
- 20,160
- Location
- Woburn Sand Dunes
So did she, depending on which version of events you believe. She suffered childhood drama remember, though she skipped right over that.......
Some people have been listening to her lies for 6 years now.
Yea my mind was made up[ a long time ago. My beilief is that she is a manipulatiting little witch. She seems get to get involved with all the lead actors she stars with. The latest being Jason mamoa which nearly broke up his marrage.
Now don't get me wrong his fault too so no defence for him, but its a bit of a tell tale to her mindset.
As For Depp he has his problems, big ones, but domestic abuse was never one of them until she made the accusations.
Now don't get me wrong his fault too so no defence for him, but its a bit of a tell tale to her mindset.
As For Depp he has his problems, big ones, but domestic abuse was never one of them until she made the accusations.
Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2005
- Posts
- 12,659
Well there is the fact a UK court did find he assaulted her so maybe it's true but I admit I did not follow that case at all apart from the verdict so have no idea what evidence was presented in that case but so far the evidence in this open case is pretty thin
- Joined
- 6 Jan 2013
- Posts
- 22,177
- Location
- Rollergirl
Cavity search. Wow, that came across as really fake.
Soldato
- Joined
- 17 Aug 2003
- Posts
- 20,160
- Location
- Woburn Sand Dunes
Disregard the UK ruling. Depp didnt get a fair trial, even the US judge said that.
Soldato
- Joined
- 20 Jun 2005
- Posts
- 2,724
- Location
- Derby
Liars concentrate on loads of random small details, fills in for the gaps in their stories
i.e. the dirty carpet....
i.e. the dirty carpet....
And even that raises questions as they had house keepers, and the carpet was supposedly so dirty etc....
I don't know what to make of how much she's lying or telling the truth, but I must admit it's odd there's no tears at all.It's called "acting".
Permabanned
- Joined
- 25 Oct 2004
- Posts
- 9,078
Yep like the dress she made or her dog stepping on a bee, all minor irrelevant details to make her seem more relatable to the Jury.