Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2005
- Posts
- 12,611
From what I've read, the only thing certified was the viewing port by the company that manufactured it, and it was only certified to 1300metersAccording to an 'Expert' yesterday in Submarine recovery, they only had a certificate to 3000 metres.
When he was told there was a 1% chance of survival he said it's nowhere near that high.
In his filing, Lochridge said the viewing port at the forward end of the submersible was built to sustain a certified pressure of 1,300 meters (4,265 feet), although OceanGate planned to take passengers down to depths of some 4,000 meters.
Titanic sub firm fired exec who raised safety concerns: suit
The former director of marine operations for the US company whose Titanic tourism submersible is missing raised safety concerns before being fired, according to a 2018 lawsuit.In a counterclaim, Lochridge said he was fired by OceanGate in January 2018 after he "raised critical safety concerns...
news.yahoo.com
Almost a year after the Marine Technology Society letter was sent, OceanGate published a blogpost explaining why it would not have Titan certified.
It is not clear whether the Titan has received industry certification since the blogpost was published, but in 2022 a CBS News reporter who was due to travel on the vessel reported that the waiver he signed read: “This experimental vessel has not been approved or certified by any regulatory body.”
Titanic submersible: documents reveal multiple concerns raised over safety of vessel
A 2018 letter from industry leaders urged OceanGate to have its Titan sub classed by an independent agency
www.theguardian.com
Although all of this is moot because if the noises heard are survivors, then obviously the sub is still intact and it's an issue with sub systems