The US Navy detected “an acoustic anomaly consistent with an implosion” shortly after the Titan lost contact with the surface, an official has told CBS News, the BBC's US partner.
The information was relayed to the US Coast Guard, which used it to narrow the radius of its search, the official added.
The banging that was reported earlier is now thought to have been coming from other ships in the area, CBS reports.
It's a small community, I wouldn't be surprised if info is passed around those who know each otherNot sure about that, it sounds like Oceangate sat on pertinent information.
I think it means there's a lot more known about the wreck site, but the people doing the press conference only want to give out info what they know is a fact, which is sensible for such an incident
Correct. A waiver does not exempt them from liability. People will be going to jail for this.Indeed that was one of my thoughts, some lawyers are gonna get rich out of this.
Signing a waiver is one thing, but if the craft wasn't fit for purpose or in the state they claimed I think there are going to be all sorts of civil cases incoming.
It'll no doubt be the subject of a documentary in the future.
Well yeah, the US Navy gave them the info, not Oceangate. Certainly looks like people within the organisation were talking to friends, but officially if doesn’t look like Oceangate themselves were being completely open to the various rescue organisations.It's a small community, I wouldn't be surprised if info is passed around those who know each other
People will be going to jail for this.
Pretty much comes down to the CEO putting too much faith in his hull monitoring system while using a carbon fibre hull that should have been used once only
I don't quite understand what you're implying ? Do you think Oceangate have been hiding info from the rescue efforts ? Once they lost contact they knew as much as everyone else, so it would require them knowing something while in contact that they haven't mentioned and it would require members of the team keeping quiet too, not sure it's worth conspiracy for such an international incidentWell yeah, the US Navy gave them the info, not Oceangate. Certainly looks like people within the organisation were talking to friends, but officially if doesn’t look like Oceangate themselves were being completely open to the various rescue organisations.
It’s pretty awful to give the victims families hope that there was a chance of rescue when the reality was, given the circumstances of the emergency surface attempt and then lose of contact that they already would have known they were dead by Sunday night, certainly by Monday, with US Nacy corroboration of an implosion.I don't quite understand what you're implying ? Do you think Oceangate have been hiding info from the rescue efforts ? Once they lost contact they knew as much as everyone else, so it would require them knowing something while in contact that they haven't mentioned and it would require members of the team keeping quiet too, not sure it's worth conspiracy for such an international incident
Good Lord.
At least it was too fast to be painful.
There's already one in production, IIRC.
I guess, but from their point of view until there's confirmation of a wreck, all options are on the table aren't they ?It’s pretty awful to give the victims families hope that there was a chance of rescue when the reality was, given the circumstances of the emergency surface attempt and then lose of contact that they already would have known they were dead by Sunday night, certainly by Monday, with US Nacy corroboration of an implosion.
Maybe behind the scenes the families were told the details and everything else was just a media scrum.
I'm reminded of Otto Benz's last words after the motor accident that led to his death: "Sacrifices must be made."
US Navy insider says they already detected the implosion's sound signature several days ago from the US'a navy's classified submarine detection system
US Navy insider says they already detected the implosion's sound signature several days ago from the US'a navy's classified submarine detection system
And they need to run the paperwork to get it declassified surely ?But did they recognise it at the time? Did they positively identify it at the time?