Odd that the ready availability of automatic weapons doesn't get a look-in in your analysis - odd that
To be fair, I've talked a lot about firearms in previous posts.
To outline my position; I'm essentially 'pro-gun' with the correct controls in place, which would amount to common-sense laws, not the nonsense currently occurring in the US, where it's ten times harder to buy nasal decongestant, than it is to buy a gun.
I don't believe that it's reasonable for weapons such as (in the case of Texas) AK-47's to be made available to the general public, because the amount of firepower and the capability in terms of the amount of death is can dispense, is ridiculous and unnecessary for a civilian. It's useless for personal defense (who walks around with an AK) and there are far better and sensible weapons for hunting. I would go as far as to allow weapons such as AK-47's to be available subject to
very strict controls.
That said, I don't believe banning these weapons would address the root-cause of the problem, a general ban or crackdown on some types (such as assault-style weapons) would have
some impact, but I believe the driving force behind these 'grievance killings' is rooted deep into the fabric of society that America has created, it's certainly not going to be solved quickly.
Incidentally, I do think that it is kinda naive to ignore the impact of Agent Orange's relentless vilification of Hispanics and foreigners in general . . . I wonder how his first and third wives feel about that . . .
If we look at Donald Trump and ask; 'did his words trigger some lunatic to go on a killing spree?'
I can't possibly answer it with any accuracy, but I don't think Donald Trump can be held solely responsible here, not because he words aren't harmful (because I think they probably are). But I think American society has created people, which are overly receptive to words spoken by people like Donald Trump.
It feels as though regular people in a society, have subconsciously had ten-bells beaten out of them by the media, by politicians, by social-media, all the time held captive inside a 'money-is-everything promised land', to the point where they become emotionally fragile and angry. At this point - all it takes is somebody saying or doing the wrong thing, or something on the news, that can send them over the edge and result in carnage.
In the final analysis, I would go as far as to say that people like Donald Trump could perhaps be a contributing factor, but the root cause behind this problem of mass-shootings, is a lot more complex than banning guns, or the result of some abrasive words spoken by the president.
Yup, still a relevant video ten years later.
I honestly see it as one of the biggest Elephants in the room with mass shootings, it's something that none of the legislators even dare want to confront. The news companies have serious amounts of money, trying to restrict them in any way whatsoever, or eat into their revenues in any way at all, is a battle that today's politicians wouldn't even entertain for a second.
Especially when you consider how easily politicians can be 'purchased' it wouldn't take much money (comparatively) for the American media to own them all (if they don't already)