Today's mass shooting in the US

I like how the media is supressing it's another mentally ill Trans person

Evidence please. Here's the shooter's mugshot:

Screenshot-2023-07-06-062149.png


(Source).

Very clearly male, also referred to as male.

Also a Trump supporter:

The suspect is a 40-year-old IT professional who lives in the neighborhood. On his now-deleted Facebook page, reviewed by VICE News, he posted repeatedly about his second amendment rights, his pro-gun stance, his support for former president Donald Trump, and his disdain for President Joe Biden.

But members of the far right have jumped on a handful of pictures, posted on the account three months ago, that show the suspect with long braided hair and wearing women’s clothing. These images were enough for Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene to conclusively state: “Another trans shooter,” citing an article published in the far-right conspiracy blog the Post Millennial.

Beyond the pictures posted to the suspect’s Facebook account, there is no available evidence to suggest that they are transgender.

(Source).

How about "a deviant" and then everyone's happy?

That works for me.
 
Last edited:
Evidence please.

There is a series of social media photos of him dressed as a woman which are being used to push the "he was Trans" message but I haven't seen anything else, either from the suspect, lawyers or Police to confirm anything regarding whether he was actively Trans or was simply a cross-dresser.

However, to possibly quash the potential Trans claim (or at least say he was into cross-dressing instead), in an interview his Gran claimed he was a gay man who sometimes cross-dressed but hadn't said anything about undergoing any trans surgery/treatment, and several neighbours have also been interviewed and said they regularly saw him dressed as a woman as reported below -

Gran - "(He) was gay and would sometimes dress in women’s clothing, but had not undergone gender transition surgery or treatment."

Neighbours - “We thought he was gay. We never saw him with anyone. We saw him dressed as a woman. That’s his thing. I have no problems with that.”
 
Last edited:
Evidence please. Here's the shooter's mugshot:

Screenshot-2023-07-06-062149.png


(Source).

Very clearly male, also referred to as male.

Also a Trump supporter:



(Source).



That works for me.

There are multiple photos of him cross-dressing on different occasions. There's also a post of Wesley snipes playing a drag queen which he has labelled "me at pride".
Loads of BLM and ACAB posts. Then randomly support for Trump!

It is funny seeing the articles on different sites and the focus they take.

Some focus on the guns and Trump support. The hindustan times focuses on the BLM bits. Daily Mail the cross dressing.
 
Nearly as a many children are killed and more are seriously injured by pets each year as firearms - but I don't see the same concerns aimed at the parents owning pets. You can aim most of the same justifications as well i.e. no one needs to own a pet.
That is the dumbest comparison I have seen. Pathetic.
 
Am I missing something here? Does all this trans, gay, straight, right wing left wing BS deflect attention from the fact that he used an AR-15 or similar? Isn't that what we should really be discussing? I say we, I mean those in the US?
 
Am I missing something here? Does all this trans, gay, straight, right wing left wing BS deflect attention from the fact that he used an AR-15 or similar? Isn't that what we should really be discussing? I say we, I mean those in the US?
Sure, you can discuss that he used an ar 15 amongst others and that it looks like he obtained the weapons used illegally if you wish. Where would you like to start?
 
Sure, you can discuss that he used an ar 15 amongst others and that it looks like he obtained the weapons used illegally if you wish. Where would you like to start?
Well I did say those in the US, and as I have zero intention of ever moving there, I'll leave it to them.
 
Last edited:
Am I missing something here? Does all this trans, gay, straight, right wing left wing BS deflect attention from the fact that he used an AR-15 or similar? Isn't that what we should really be discussing? I say we, I mean those in the US?

I think the discussion should be around handguns, which are used in 59% of all gun deaths in the US vs just 3% for rifles like the AR-15 (1). When it comes specifically to "mass shootings" (4 or more people shot in one incident, even if none die) again its handguns at 77% usage (2) whose deaths far exceed the AR-15, although I know the definition of mass shooting changes almost daily to make the AR-15 numbers look far higher than they are.

Just this 4th July weekend there were 15 killed and 94 wounded by gunfire (3) across the US (including those involved in the OP's event) with just 5 killed and 2 wounded by AR-15's (all from the OP's event) but outside of that single event all the rest were killed/wounded by handgun calibre weapons (handguns, PCC's etc (4), so why isn't that all over the news with people screaming for these to be banned if "saving lives" is why people want the AR-15 series banned? Is it because of the "shock" value people get from these "high peak number but low volume" deaths over the far more deadly handguns who have "low peak number but high volume" deaths?

It's also important to talk about who is shooting who in these mass shootings, which tends to be overwhelmingly criminal vs criminal but sadly ends up including bystanders, but again its depends on the ever changing definition of mass shooting i.e. if you ignore "none rifle" events then it absolutely makes the AR-15 series appear far more wide spread than they in reality, but that drops into semantics vs bias I suppose.

References

(1)


(2)

(3)

(4)
 
Back
Top Bottom