Strange how I’ve never seen one person or the media mention Barack Obama not renewing the ban on assault rifles.
He's better equipped than any of the kids being actively killed, and I'd disagree an armed police officer would likely make a big difference there. Again I'm not suggesting he goes in Rambo style... I'm not sure he'd have a nice obituary, I think it is more likely he could stay behind cover and at least restrict the moment of the shooter.
In fact even shouting at him, ordering him to put the weapon down, making him aware of the presence of a police officer could be useful and allow others to escape.
The shooter doesn't know how many police officers there are and if someone fires shots at him then he'll likely want to stay in cover too.
You wont find me disagreeing... Assault weapons are the primary choice for arming armies the world over for good reason... There efficacy at quickly killing lots of people if needed.
Nonsence you think the cop should announce his presence in advance when he knows he is massively outgunned....
If you were armed with a pistol and i had an ar15 and you were stupid enough to announce where you were in advance of shooting at me I can guarantee that more than 9 times out of 10 that you would be very quickly dead without even landing a single effective shot on me.
There is no likely cover from fire when the opponent has a rifle in environment like a school. .. The bullets can penetrate all but the densest of material travelling straight through walls....
So that's a pretty good reason to ban assault rifles then...
What's an assault weapon? A semi-automatic rifle?
indeed, you need to go back to Clinton for that... Obama was more concerned with Obama care (and to be fair better healthcare coverage probably would save more lives)
but the assault weapons ban supposedly cost the democrats approx 20 seats last time, it would have taken some moral courage and quite a bit of effort to ram through when his party had control of congress - it isn't something he pushed them for
Absolutely he should, I think he should have shot at the guy too...
again he's actively killing kids, simply shouting/ordering him to put his weapon down could help save some of them/turn his attention to something else
You can't guarantee that at all, for all you know the weak, frequently bullied kid with the rifle would suddenly **** his pants at the shouting from an unseen police officer, and doubly so if shot at...
I think you also overestimate the rifle here, if the walls are brick or concrete then they offer cover... it is 5.56 not 7.62!
I see they are trying the old "Video Games Violence is to blame" tactic again, they used to say the same about movies... Morons!
Anyone remember a time before movies and video games, wow it must have been a peaceful utopia back then with no violence...
Maybe they have to put a rating system for that.
You're a fool and very likely a dead inneffective one to boot....
Most construction in the USA is low density drywall construction.... You are dead if you are on the other side of that with a rifle armed opponent on the other side....
The cops only realistic chance would be to catch the gunman unaware
TBH sounds like blame shifting to me. The police department received multiple complaints about him, as did the FBI.So you've resorted to insults.... this is basically going no where if you can't even have a constructive conversation.
FYI the cop was behind a concrete post when other officers arrived.
It ought to be pretty obvious that an armed police officer can and likely would help in this scenario, his own police officers seemed to think so too and suspended him.
TBH sounds like blame shifting to me. The police department received multiple complaints about him, as did the FBI.
So you've resorted to insults.... this is basically going no where if you can't even have a constructive conversation.
FYI the cop was behind a concrete post when other officers arrived.
It ought to be pretty obvious that an armed police officer can and likely would help in this scenario, his own police officers seemed to think so too and suspended him.
They receive multiple complaints when cops shoot unarmed black people too, it generally takes a high threshold of incompetence over there for them to criticise a fellow officer.
You can call it insulting you want ... I would suggest its a statement of practical fact that it would be highly foolish to announce, in advance, your presence to a rifle wielding opponent, especially if you were only armed with a typical US police issue 9mm pistol...
That you then went on to suggest the officer would apparently readily be able to find effective cover once inside the school (not likely many concrete walls or posts once inside) rather compounds this asseament
I see they are trying the old "Video Games Violence is to blame" tactic again, they used to say the same about movies... Morons!
Anyone remember a time before movies and video games, wow it must have been a peaceful utopia back then with no violence...