I think it's fair to say there's going to be a big slow down and I suspect recession on the back of this affecting the major economies of the world. So yes, the current crisis is enough to bet against that. My view is that of course it'll go back up, but the bottom isn't here yet. It won't be here until the UK and US go into similar lockdowns seen elsewhere. So for me it makes sense to sell now, hold cash, and buy back in when the price is even lower than today. I can't say what the best time is, but I believe that the falls will keep coming so it makes sense to sell and buy back in at a later, lower, point, to maximise returns.
Trading the stockmarket (NO Referrals)
- Thread starter mcast123
- Start date
I think it's fair to say there's going to be a big slow down and I suspect recession on the back of this affecting the major economies of the world. So yes, the current crisis is enough to bet against that. My view is that of course it'll go back up, but the bottom isn't here yet. It won't be here until the UK and US go into similar lockdowns seen elsewhere. So for me it makes sense to sell now, hold cash, and buy back in when the price is even lower than today. I can't say what the best time is, but I believe that the falls will keep coming so it makes sense to sell and buy back in at a later, lower, point, to maximise returns.
That is absurd, to my mind. All evidence, ever, points to what you are doing as a bad idea. Selling ‘low’ with an expectation that you can buy in lower, is fundamentally misaligned with your goals.
What you have done is locked in a loss, in the hope that you can time the rise. You might get lucky, but you weren’t lucky enough to sell out before the drop, how will you be lucky next time?
I get it, honestly I do. I’m not making judgments about your decision - seeing your portfolio dip is not fun. However this is the nature of the beast of equity. What if old Bojo, or any other nation in the world, announces tomorrow that there is a working vaccine? Market rallies 20% or 30% and you miss it? Big numbers, yes, but we have grown accustomed to 5-10% drops, why not a 30%+ rise?
I’m just suggesting that your logic is faulty, not that your decision is bad.
What you have done is locked in a loss, in the hope that you can time the rise. You might get lucky, but you weren’t lucky enough to sell out before the drop, how will you be lucky next time?
I get it, honestly I do. I’m not making judgments about your decision - seeing your portfolio dip is not fun. However this is the nature of the beast of equity. What if old Bojo, or any other nation in the world, announces tomorrow that there is a working vaccine? Market rallies 20% or 30% and you miss it? Big numbers, yes, but we have grown accustomed to 5-10% drops, why not a 30%+ rise?
I’m just suggesting that your logic is faulty, not that your decision is bad.
Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2005
- Posts
- 12,660
Breakers hit again
Associate
- Joined
- 19 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 482
- Location
- Kirkham, Preston
If you have money to burn, invest. Lots of companies could go bust worldwide, and one going down can domino others. The best advice to investing is to always do what you would normally do. In other words, don't put more in when the market goes down, don't sell low with the hope it goes lower. Investing in a fund can be a better idea as it spreads your risk over a number of stocks and shares. Over the long term, stocks overall tend to go up, but in most cases, people don't make a fast buck, but lose a lot of bucks pretty quickly!
No, they’re going straight down. Or up. Definitely down. DOW at 1000, or maybe a billion.
There is a humility in this game. Of course the ‘only’ way can’t be up. Has the nature of the world fundamentally changed these last few weeks? If you believe the answer to that question is ‘no’, then it’s a great time to buy. You’re getting the same thing, but with a discount.
Apple is still apple; Amazon is still amazon. But if you are asking random strangers on the internet, I wonder whether you are going about this the right way.
There is a humility in this game. Of course the ‘only’ way can’t be up. Has the nature of the world fundamentally changed these last few weeks? If you believe the answer to that question is ‘no’, then it’s a great time to buy. You’re getting the same thing, but with a discount.
Apple is still apple; Amazon is still amazon. But if you are asking random strangers on the internet, I wonder whether you are going about this the right way.
Were these the same people advising to buy stocks last year as markets just keep going up?
Steer clear, unless you can put yourself in a position where you're more sure, or have a better understanding and tolerance for the risk. It's not a game to be playing if you don't know what you're letting yourself in for, especially at a time like this.
Folks, we need to have a bit of a PSA here. A 10 year bull run has infected yo’ minds.
Neither you, nor I, can predict the stock market falls or rises. When we do so, we do so with a tongue in cheek, acknowledging that we really don’t know - or accept that it is gambling. You might get it right, but you might get it wrong.
Investing in the market is different to buying shares. The idea is that you invest in a broad index, which, over a period of time increases in value as the world moves to increasing efficiency, productivity etc. It may not, but it always has done in the past. That’s the best that we have.
If you can’t cope with 50% falls, you should consider whether the stock market is for you. You accept, however, the returns you will get in a high-interest savings account. That is fine. You should not invest money that you need in the short or medium term.
The value of your investment account matters on two dates; the day you buy, and the day you sell. The stuff in between is completely unknown, and unknowable, so it’s just noise.
Neither you, nor I, can predict the stock market falls or rises. When we do so, we do so with a tongue in cheek, acknowledging that we really don’t know - or accept that it is gambling. You might get it right, but you might get it wrong.
Investing in the market is different to buying shares. The idea is that you invest in a broad index, which, over a period of time increases in value as the world moves to increasing efficiency, productivity etc. It may not, but it always has done in the past. That’s the best that we have.
If you can’t cope with 50% falls, you should consider whether the stock market is for you. You accept, however, the returns you will get in a high-interest savings account. That is fine. You should not invest money that you need in the short or medium term.
The value of your investment account matters on two dates; the day you buy, and the day you sell. The stuff in between is completely unknown, and unknowable, so it’s just noise.
My personal opinion (and it is only that) is that assuming you're investing, wait until the market has stabilised and hasn't dropped significantly for a couple of weeks. You might miss the absolute bottom but that's much better than kicking off a position with a ~30% loss.
It would be helpful if people on this thread recognise the difference between investing and trading. Although the thread is titled trading it seems that many posters seem to be under the impression everybody should be saving for their pension and thus being condescending to anyone that's interested in shorter term trading.
Market movements like this don't come around often, some of us want to discuss taking advantage of it.
Caveat - if your mates/colleagues are giving you stock advice....don't. Unless you really, really can lose your money and deal with the mental side of it on top of the virus situation, now is not the time to get involved.
Market movements like this don't come around often, some of us want to discuss taking advantage of it.
Caveat - if your mates/colleagues are giving you stock advice....don't. Unless you really, really can lose your money and deal with the mental side of it on top of the virus situation, now is not the time to get involved.
Permabanned
- Joined
- 9 Aug 2009
- Posts
- 12,234
- Location
- UK
I had chinese, it was pretty late.
Having topped up my S&S ISA for the year a few weeks ago I still have a little held as cash and also have a pension transfer in progress to my SIPP ongoing.
I've a not-an-insignificant amount of capital earmarked for my SIPP too (utilising previous years unused allowances but of course not exceeding earnings.)
Contemplating allocating some of this to specific companies which have suffered recently but that should recover well to take some modest gains before investing with a longer term view.
For now like most I am waiting on the sidelines and will start dripping in over the next few weeks and months.
I've a not-an-insignificant amount of capital earmarked for my SIPP too (utilising previous years unused allowances but of course not exceeding earnings.)
Contemplating allocating some of this to specific companies which have suffered recently but that should recover well to take some modest gains before investing with a longer term view.
For now like most I am waiting on the sidelines and will start dripping in over the next few weeks and months.
Like I said, when it's following something approaching normal patterns for a couple of weeks. It's not an exact science (as much as some people will pretend otherwise) and if you're investing for the medium / long term then it doesn't have to be. You just don't want to see a severe loss in the first couple of weeks due to a once in a generation (possibly) crash.
People who are trying to beat the benchmarks will have their own strategies, but as they're always based on historical data I think their utility is probably limited in situations like this. Even professional investment houses with effectively unlimited resources and preferential deals struggle to consistently beat benchmarks.