You must be new here. Sadly there's a thread like this once per month where it's a-ok to openly hate trans people or just flat out deny they exist.
Ah the 'progressive' fallback of naming an opposition to your beliefs 'hateful' because your beliefs are risible nonsence and cannot be defended on their merits.
We see through this ruse...
Not inherently. I think it's possible to discuss the topic respectfully without intentionally mis-gendering, which is definitely transphobic and something I've seen plenty of.
As has always been pointed out if you lie by, for example, saying that a man is a woman then you have really weakened you ability to defend sex based differentiation and rights.
So no men will remain men and women will remain women regardless of how they identify.
There a reason 'big brother' had Newspeak and wanted to control language to such a high degree. Namely so that people would lack even the very language to object to what was being done to them.
Define 'woman'
Pro tip: you are going to fail if you have to use the word woman or similar to describe what a women is (circular definitions dont actually define anything) and if you definition is a 'feeling' what exactly is that feeling and how would one know what it was?
because TRA's consistently fail to provide a coherent definition of what a 'woman is.
When we already have a pretty coherent definition for the word....
I.e adult human female
Adult - a person who is fully grown or developed. Typically(and legally) taken to be around 18 years old.
Human - of or belonging to the genus
Homo.
Female - of or denoting the sex that can bear offspring or produce eggs, distinguished biologically by the production of gametes (ova) which can be fertilized by male gametes.
*Please note that a woman who cannot or does not produce large, immobile gametes doesn't stop being a woman any more than a person who loses their legs or is not born with them would cease to be human with humans being a bipedal species.
Does anybody know if she is lifting the same as a woman than when she was a man?
Hubbard was a mediocre male lifter closer to their prime.
They ar now at an age where females would be extremely unlikely to be competitive.
Hence all the TRA's banging on about trans trans women not having an advantage.
Apparently they think that a mediocre man, well past his prime, not 100% being assured of dominating elite women, still in their prime, is evidence that trans women don't have a significant advantage from their biology.
