Travellers descend on Asda car park and refuse to move in stand off with police

You just couldn't make it up, what total bull, is this a deliberate intent to wind their paymasters up? The police are becoming a waste of tax payer's money in so many ways.
the war on drugs is going well though, they are always posting on facebook about seizing 1 gram of weed from people, it's a big victory for the war on drugs.

welsh police were recently mocked for raiding some womans house whilst her kids were at home and finding £10 worth of weed and 55hours or whatever it was of planning.
north yorkshire police were moaning on about some guy they caught at a nature reserve with what looked like 0.2grams of weed.

nice to see such effective policing in the country, obviously far to much real crime taking place when they can afford to divert resources for a guy smoking a spiffy in a nature reserve
 
War on drugs, sex workers etc to stop it is like trying tp push water up hill with your bare hands.

You are not going to stop people making use of both so it cheaper and better for society to make it as clean/safe/regulated as it can be. Less crime, more tax, happier people in general.
 
It happened to a Co-op car park round the corner I couldn't quite believe what I was seeing when a convoy of caravans piled into the car park friday night they got out and promptly started making a camp fire as if they were on a camp site. Their kids were treating the shopping trolleys like go karts and climbing over rails like they were climbing frames. Sunday night saw the cops heading up that way blue lights ablaze, can't say I was surprised. Not sure what happened but they were gone by monday...
 
DRACONIAN bans to stop travellers camping on public land have seen incursions plummet, town hall chiefs say.
By Jon Austin
PUBLISHED: 08:38, Sun, Aug 19, 2018 | UPDATED: 08:53, Sun, Aug 19, 2018
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1...le-towns-Draconian-laws-used-in-new-crackdown

"The “blanket” injunctions, which mean anyone pulling up on affected sites can be arrested, jailed or fined, can effectively ban travellers from entire boroughs.

Councils applying for the orders have given the High Court witness statements and photographs of commercial waste, including asbestos, excrement and damaged locks from vacated sites.

Previously, councils have reacted to traveller incursions, but they can now outlaw them before they happen.

Nearly 20 authorities across London, Essex, Hampshire, Surrey, the West Midlands and Lancashire now have interim or blanket injunctions, with more believed to be preparing applications.
Related articles

Traveller crackdown: Tory MPs urge new law to move camps on QUICKLY
Travellers leave rubbish and human FAECES in children's play area

Gipsy and traveller organisations have slammed the new power, claiming it will prevent their nomadic way of life.

Sarah Sweeney of Friends, Families and Travellers said: “We are deeply saddened to hear that increasing numbers of councils are using injunctions to prevent gipsy and traveller families from stopping in their area.

“Local authorities have largely failed to identify land for families to stop so it should come as little surprise when they pull up in public spaces and on private land.”

A spokesman for the Community Law Partnership, which has represented travellers for several years, said: “We think these wide injunction actions, which are becoming more common, are potentially highly challengeable.”
Travellers camp at Blackburn’s Thwaites Brewery

There has been a marked reduction in the number of encampments with no incursions since March this year

Kevin Blake

London Borough Sutton is the latest to obtain the power, following a series of costly clean-ups after incursions in recent weeks.

The High Court has granted an interim injunction order for three months, banning caravans from 182 sites, before a full application is heard.

The injunctions ban named individuals and “persons unknown” from parking caravans and vehicles and dumping waste in areas they cover.

If all councils were granted the power, it could effectively see an end to the bulk of unauthorised camps.

Harlow council in Essex, which has two permanent traveller sites, was the first to get the ban, protecting 322 sites, in March 2015, after 109 incursions in 18 months.

Council leader Mark Ingall said: “This has had the effect of significantly reducing the number and duration of unauthorised encampments and the clean-up costs.

It quickly resolves any issues, usually within 24 hours.”

Basildon in Essex secured one last November and councillor Kevin Blake said: “There has been a marked reduction in the number of encampments with no incursions since March this year.”


20 authorities now have interim or blanket injunctions (Image: GETTY )

Greenwich in South-east London now has 203 parks and open spaces protected.

A spokeswoman said: “It has been hugely successful. There has only been one incursion since the ban was put in place.”

Redbridge, in east London, saw 40 incursions in 2007.

But since securing an interim injunction in June, covering 235 sites, it has seen just one incident on council land, with culprits moved on within two hours, and another on private land."
 
Why "should" they? Or we?
Are we not born free on this planet?

No thats fine but then they need to live outside of society and all the advantages of it. Get ill, tough luck. Want to claim any benefits, nope. Want to use the road system, sorry, you need to pay your taxes.

This is why anyone who claims to live the cheap life by doing x,y and z is usually a idiot who doesn't realise that the rest of society working is what allows them to live their apparently frugal life.
 
Already been said but there should be no access to paid for services if you choose to live outside of society. No NHS / public facilities, nothing. But this type of so called travellers/gypsies don’t live outside of society. They leach off it.
And to add insult to injury, they have the cheek to steal off the people who are paying for them!
 
This is why anyone who claims to live the cheap life by doing x,y and z is usually an idiot who doesn't realise that the rest of society working is what allows them to live their apparently frugal life.[/QUOTE]


OR, they do, and can’t stop laughing.
 
Already been said but there should be no access to paid for services if you choose to live outside of society. No NHS / public facilities, nothing. But this type of so called travellers/gypsies don’t live outside of society. They leach off it.

But you'll have another small humanitarian crisis and they know it. They're just the same as chavs in that they know that ultimately the state will provide for them.
 
Back
Top Bottom