Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
.
Edit not sure what those minimums are. Probably a fractional second drop but it was smooth enough on both and I definitely didn't perceive a drop to 3 FPS
Can you match my clocks? 1200/1750.
Wondering if you could try a single 7950 at my clocks with your settings (ultimi +4xSS) to put to sleep the clock for clock 50vs70? a lot of different figures get thrown about
Can you match my clocks? 1200/1750.
Wondering if you could try a single 7950 at my clocks with your settings (ultimi +4xSS) to put to sleep the clock for clock 50vs70? a lot of different figures get thrown about
Yes be he only compared them on a synthetic benchmark so it's not incredibly useful hence the request to actually compare it on something useful.
He may have compared more but only provided proof of the benchmark. He might be right: I'm just yet to see proof.
, but anyway, feel free to call it as you see.
) so it varies, which resulted in my 5-10% ballpark figure, I'll draw a line under it there.
You just wait until [H] get wind of this, oooohhh Nvidia are going to get a right telling off.
It won't be mentioned, or if it does they will have mixed and matched settings so the Nvidia cards win. They managed it with sleeping dogs, a game that is CLEARLY faster and smoother on AMD hardware. I have faith in their ability to find a way.
