If I ran round work swearing at members of the public and screaming obsceneties in the face of figures of authority I would expect to get to get in a lot more bother
If you were abused to the levels of professional footballers you might.
If I ran round work swearing at members of the public and screaming obsceneties in the face of figures of authority I would expect to get to get in a lot more bother
No, but I'm using my judgement based on the evidence I have telling me that he's more likely to be a revolting individual than not. General demeanour and behaviour on the pitch that is, nothing to do with what's in the papers. It is somewhat arbitrary yes, but that's the impression I get of him.
I'm sure even you make judgements about people without meeting them Castiel.
I don't read the papers but you'll find that nearly everybody in the country dislikes Rooney, take your head out of the sand, why do you think the whole of Upton Park abused him? Because he's a fine young fellow with a good attitude, a dedicated family man, always polite, always sincere, or because he's deeply dislikeable?
If you were abused to the levels of professional footballers you might.
Professionalism is professionalism.
There are paid for the talent and success they bring to a football club, not because they have some innate social responsibility.
They are sportmen not social workers or politicians, there is no social governance criteria in being a footballer.
he takes endorsements, therefore he has responsibility
And if they don't like his behaviour they can drop him. Nothing to do with the FA.
If I ran round work swearing at members of the public and screaming obsceneties in the face of figures of authority I would expect to get to get in a lot more bother
"That's it, I'm not drinking Coke any more because Rooney said **** on camera!!!"
he takes endorsements, therefore he has responsibility
To what?
Wear their boots?
Appear in adverts for computer games?
I doubt in any of the agreements he signed it said "must be faithfull to wife, must not swear"
Honestly.
he takes endorsements, therefore he has responsibility
No he doesn't, the corporations that hire him have corporate responsibility, that is about it.
And I bet those employed directly by those corporations swear at work every now and again.
To what?
Wear their boots?
Appear in adverts for computer games?
I doubt in any of the agreements he signed it said "must be faithfull to wife, must not swear"
Honestly.
united fans are so blinkered it is quite unreal. think what you like. i would bet that you'd all be singing to a different tune had he done it in a city shirt!