Caporegime
My kind? What exactly do you mean by that?
It's almost like he's generalising you...somewhat akin to racism!
My kind? What exactly do you mean by that?
Answer the question and back up your claim of what this something else is then? Stop dancing around it.
I dont think children being abused by a priest is a cultural thing as i dont think the term applies. So yeah in those cases its something else
It is a cultural issue, not a religious one.
What you are trying is just a rehash of the "no true Scotsman" argument. Hate to break it to you, the priests that molested kids were still priests.
because culture and religion are in no way connected no sir not at all.
I mean next you'll be telling me the liberal western culture has made religions over here accept women priests or something mental like that.
or that religion has affected the culture to the point the queen is labelled something silly like defender of the faith.
It's not as simple as this, people claim it's BECAUSE of the religion that people do these things, as if it's actually part of the belief system. As in, abuse of children is penciled it as a must after they've made their prayers.
It's dirty old men being dirty old men, we have them as white British too, but for some reason all the white British dirty old men get called dirty old men, their race or creed is never a part of it.
It's dirty old men being dirty old men, we have them as white British too, but for some reason all the white British dirty old men get called dirty old men, their race or creed is never a part of it.
well the very heavy belief that Muslims are a "selected" people, that infidels are worthless along with a serious indoctrinated system where women are considered lesser than men and you can quickly see how non Muslim, girls become an acceptable target.
yet its disturbingly disproportional isnt it.
On what basis? How the media reports things?
no convictions vs population %.
iirc its 52 out of the last 60 men for these gang grooming siutations have been ethically Asian, for a population that's what 1% of the total population thats a worrying disproportionality.
My kind? What exactly do you mean by that?
iirc its 52 out of the last 60 men for these gang grooming siutations have been ethically Asian, for a population that's what 1% of the total population thats a worrying disproportionality.
It's actually 7% (as of the 2011 Census).
The uneducated kind. Remember when I created the thread about the Christian peodophile gang to prove a point?
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18667695&highlight=startername_Twirlywoos
In no way would I demonise an entire religion because of the actions of a few. That's just tarnishing everyone with the same brush and is quite frankly retarded. The same **** goes on in India also and that isn't a Muslim country.
You're missing the point though, the argument usually goes "because that's what priests do" but my point is that they've become priests to do that sort of stuff.
The bottom line here is I don't for one minute, believe that they believe in the religion they claim to be part of, whilst doing this sort of thing.
All religious people believe they are selected people, it isn't something that's inherent to Islam.
That being said, this realistically isn't how actual practicing Muslims, who believe what they practice actually think, from my experience and others I know.
Especially considering the part of Islam where Muslims are commanded to follow the law of the land that they reside in.
On what basis? How the media reports things? When the world trade centres fell, Muslim public speakers came out and condemned it, but the media didn't give them any coverage at all, which is the basis for why people still think that Muslims "need to condemn these actions more", not that they actually do, I'm sure you don't feel the need to publicly condemn the actions of Jimmy Saville on the basis that you are also a white British male, no?
fair enough that's shot up. weird to think we have more Asians than black people where now then.