U.F.O'S

Azagoth said:
Yes, because an alien race travelled light years in an highly advanced inter-stellar craft to do nothing more than levitate a few submarines above the Countryside, in such a manner that every photograph turns out to be nothing but a blurry tube.

Probably make more sense if it turned out to be 'alien adolescents' who've stolen the keys to their parents saucer and are out having a laugh at our expense.
Click to expand...

We're talking about man made tech here.
 
magick said:
They've been spotted before :-
Click to expand...

All those 4 photographs are completely different.
It would be more believable if all 4 triangle shapes were the same but spotted in different parts of the world.

I'm amazed that we've been visited by 1000s upon 1000s of UFOs'/Aliens but still none of them (as clever as they are) have decided to make themselves known properly.
 
magick said:
There's been a mass of UFO sightings recently in the UK particularly Wales.

TH1_15w2p08fufo.jpg
Click to expand...

Im failing to see the UFO in this picture.
 
dmpoole said:
I'm amazed that we've been visited by 1000s upon 1000s of UFOs'/Aliens but still none of them (as clever as they are) have decided to make themselves known properly.
Click to expand...

For me that is almost one of the most convincing reasons for thinking that there could be intelligent life out there, I could well understand their reluctance to actually visit Earth. Let's face it, we haven't exactly done a great job of looking after it or ourselves.
 
The thing about the Lightnings. There was an incident involving both a lightning and a ufo interception. If memory serves me correctlty and I am assuming that a Lightning was a plane whereby the cockpit canopy had to be bolted on or fastened from the outside- the interception actually led to the disappearance of the pilot. The aircraft was found lying on the seabed minus the pilot with the cockpit still closed and sealed. I remember seeing this on a documentry years ago. Completely unexplained.
 
Radiation said:
How does that work here, i see objects moving through space, i think this ones a little hard to debunk as either debris or light, the way it moves and follows the shuttle is hard to explain away by those things, also how it actually gets in formation is a sign.

There's also the tether incident where many objects and no doubt some debris are flying around, some of these objects turn in space, something in motion stays in motion, especially in the emptiness of space.
Click to expand...

Out of interest I've just been looking into what the STS-80 mission involved. The fact the video has no time code and no information markers which is very odd makes it hard to match it up with any experiments etc. Of interest might be that there were two satellites deployed and recovered by Columbia. One of them was called WSF-3 which was 12" in diameter and shaped like a disc, the other one was called ORFEUS-SPAS. The two satellites flew behind Columbia at distances ranging between 20 and 70 miles during the course of the mission, to any of the cameras videoing them they would appear to be just shiny points of light.

As for the objects hitting the Earth in a pattern and appearing to light up it's apparently quite common for objects entering the atmosphere to break apart and form patterns due to the way they split. They light up at different times because they enter the atmosphere at different times.
 
Radiation said:
Finished watching it a while ago, found it quite interesting, thanks.

Know any others worth watching? :)
Click to expand...

I had a quick look at that it and it seemed very dubious, showing pictures of proven hoaxes and full of speculation rather than information.

One of the better films on the subject is "Out of the Blue" although it's still flawed:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5545276251937701731&hl=en

Nick Cook a defence journalist, did a film for Channel 4 a couple of years ago on the subject which was very good indeed:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-834605691449249469&hl=en
 
Radiation said:
Thanks, im not sure if i've watched the first one but i know i've seen the second one which from memory was pretty good. :)
Click to expand...

Yeah there is a lot in the second one, has good credible whitenesses and excellent investigation from Nick Cook who isn't someone from the UFO field with a bias. However he is open minded enough to do a proper investigation and chase the story wherever it goes.
 
magick said:
scotland2002.jpg


belgium1990.jpg


amtraktrianglelarge.jpg


My wife her mother and sister all spotted the black triangle from the parents house in France 15 years ago.

I bought this dvd years ago - http://www.amazon.com/Voyagers-Sixth-Sun-Brit-Elders/dp/B00004S5JD

It has news footage from live national parades and tv shows documenting these strange balls in the sky. One of the clips was a tv programme about the balls and at the end they went outside and invited the ufo's to show themselves if they were intelligent beings and as the credits were scrolling these lights started to appear in the sky.

EDIT: Oh and personally I believe the universe is teeming with life, whether they visit us on a regular basis is another matter though.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Yeah i liked that one because it was the first i watched with a lot of the nasa footage a few years ago, though i suspect some will be put off by the conspiracy stuff in it.
 
I used to read a lot about UFOs. I rented hundreds of books from the library, I poured over hundreds of hours of grainy video and thousands of photographs. I even looked into official documents, stuff like the Project Bluebook files and whatnot.

Oh, and did I forget to mention? I was about fourteen at the time. I grew up and discovered logic.

These days if I'm confronted with someone talking about, or if I see an article about, UFOs I can usually explain it quite easily by comparing it to some imaging anomaly or some natural phenomena. That is, at least, if the picture/video is not so insanely low-res and grainy that it could be fleas on a dog. When it comes to stuff I can't explain I generally say that, at the most extreme, it's probably some experimental aircraft as we've been testing top secret aircraft for decades now.

The day I see a picture of a UFO that's even half as detailed as these photos, for example, I will think before laughing at conspiracy nuts who instantly jump to the conclusion that it's extra-terrestrial in origin. My phone can take better pictures of stuff in the sky than 99% of UFO footage I have seen.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom