That's not a bug, it's a feature.How is it all these modern "web 2.0" companies like Uber and Deliverroo are built on shafting the "employee". I don't see anything innovative about that, more like going back to the dark ages.
That's not a bug, it's a feature.How is it all these modern "web 2.0" companies like Uber and Deliverroo are built on shafting the "employee". I don't see anything innovative about that, more like going back to the dark ages.
*whine whine* "But, but, but Uber is sooo unsafe..."
Oh wait: https://www.standard.co.uk/news/cri...s-charged-with-crimes-last-year-a3226396.html
And black cab drivers and minicab drivers. Let's ban them all and everyone can walk. That will be much safer.Those numbers include Uber drivers.
And black cab drivers and minicab drivers. Let's ban them all and everyone can walk. That will be much safer.
I thought they only had tariff *maximums* set?
I'm not sure that I understand what you mean with *maximums*.
Depending on the time of day, the meter will run on Rate 1 from 05.00 until 20.00, Rate 2 from 20.00 until 22.00, and Rate 3 from 22.00 until 05.00.
If you get in a black cab at e.g. 21.40, the meter will run on Rate 2 until 22.00, then automatically switch to Rate 3, it will keep running on Rate 3 until the journey ends, unless, in an extremely unlikely scenario, you're still in the cab at 05.00, when it will revert to Rate 1.
There is no maximum, the meter won't stop at say £250.00, it will keep ticking over.
Of course, there are occasions, when a fare will flag you down in The City at 01.00, and say e.g., "I need to get to Westerham, will you do it for £120.00 cash."
If you live somewhere like Bromley, Beckenham, Catford etc., and were thinking it was time to go home, you"d drag the guy in through the window.
does anyone have any details re: how uber's checks are less rigorous than other private hire firms or whether uber's rate of attacks by drivers is worse than the competition?
- Most don't keep dodgy drivers or bad drivers, they will get sucked immediately ( the ones overcharge, perverts, aggressive and so on ).
TFL are very clear that "Transport for London (TfL) licenses and regulates taxi and private hire services in London. As part of this, we set the maximum fares that taxis (black cabs) can charge"
It's not unfeasible that less could be charged to increase competition. After all, black cabs can be cheaper with some apps anyway.
Point is if there are 300 private hire offices around London that means 300 to 1000 dispatchers, 1000 to 3000 call takers dealing with drivers face to face daily keeping them at bay while with Uber its an automated service where complains are dealt with emails. Drivers are only called to their office if its something very serious so most drivers get away with overcharging or with other stuff.
I'm sure this is true but as I posted a long time ago Uber is banned in a number of "progressive" cities. Austin for example is a big, up and coming tech hub with Apple offices etc. It's banned there. Vancouver also.Uber will make some concessions and a deal will be struck. I doubt there will be a single minute where Uber drivers aren’t on London’s roads.
I'm sure this is true but as I posted a long time ago Uber is banned in a number of "progressive" cities. Austin for example is a big, up and coming tech hub with Apple offices etc. It's banned there. Vancouver also.
Fair enough. Doesn't escape the fact it was banned in Austin for a while though so my point still stands.
does anyone have any details re: how uber's checks are less rigorous than other private hire firms or whether uber's rate of attacks by drivers is worse than the competition?
UBER please.... Its an app and upfront payment.
The payment of which goes straight to some dodgy tax scheme that only seem to make Rich, dodgy Americans.
Sorry chaps, until you start paying tax fairly you can go swivel, I would ban you outright tbh.