Well in a recent interview with Andy Cole on SSN, he said that Fergie doesn't actually really coach or get involved at all with tactics or training sessions, just watches and picks the team + motivates.
All the tactical side of things is left to the Nr2.
So in that sense you cant really blame Fergie i guess.
Well you can, firstly he's responsible for hiring a number 2 who is good enough, secondly Andy Cole may have got most of his training and tactics in the build up to the game from Fergie's no.2, that doesn't mean that when Cole isn't there Fergie isn't laying it out point by point for his no.2 to then go and tell everyone else..... also it doesn't mean he's doing the same thing now as he was a decade ago.
Essentially its useless information, if his then no.2 was more tactically astute than Fergie, then a good manager would use his no.2 for it, if his current no.2 isn't as good as Fergie, a good manager would take that responsibility back.
Either way, Fergie is responsible as he's the manager, and as said, he either chooses his number 2, or does it himself. Most top managers don't get massively involved with training, manager = manager, coach = coach for a huge number of teams. Doesn't mean a manager can't be a great coach, but realistically a manager can't do EVERYTHING, you delegate, that's realistically his job title to put the right people in place to get a particular job done the best it can be done.
Fergie's responsible, and Fergie has let the team slip dramatically.
What? Rooney was **** last night, the only way Nani could have set it up more for him is by placing the ball in front of his foot then swinging his leg for him to connect!
Quite, Rooney was crap and he's often crap, and often very good. He didn't "foresee" anything, he saw City wages and wanted some of that for himself, nothing more or less. If he saw this coming and THAT was what was important to him, he'd have gone to city or Spain or somewhere else. He wanted money, he got money, he probably doesn't give a crap about much past that.
Problem is, would Utd have bought more players, and have been more capable of affording a Sneijder, or a Pastore, or someone else in the creative midfield role....... if Rooney wasn't sucking 100k a week out of the wage budget more than he should be.
For me, Rooney CAN be good, he's not the BEST at any single part of his game, he's not in the world top 3, he's not in the worlds top 10 strikers, let alone the worlds top 10 best players, Utd should have stuck to a realistic contract, either seen Rooney back down, or sell Rooney for a crapload to City/Malaga/Real/whoever. Honestly, CIty with Rooney right now, would be a worse team, win win for Utd
If Rooney cared about the team someone should have sat him down and explained, if we give you 100k a week more than anyone sane would want to, we won't be able to strengthen elsewhere, and that's what makes a mockery of Rooney's give me a massive pay rise to prove we'll improve demands, he HURT the team more than he helped it by doing that.