In a full scale nuclear war the lucky will be those who die instantly. I hope I would be one them.in the event of nuclear war, Russia have underground bunkers inside the cities
for all of the population. the Mariupol steel plant an example.
wonder where in UK my nearest bunker is?
there is none.
"A subsequent study, published in 2019, looked at a comparable but slightly lower 150 Tg [150 million tons] atmospheric soot injection following an equivalent scale nuclear war. The devastation causes so much smoke that only 30-40 percent of sunlight reaches the Earth’s surface for the subsequent six months.
A massive drop in temperature follows, with the weather staying below freezing throughout the subsequent Northern Hemisphere summer. In Iowa, for example, the model shows temperatures staying below 0°C for 730 days straight. There is no growing season. This is a true nuclear winter.
Nor is it just a short blip. Temperatures still drop below freezing in summer for several years thereafter, and global precipitation falls by half by years three and four. It takes over a decade for anything like climatic normality to return to the planet.
By this time, most of Earth’s human population will be long dead. The world’s food production would crash by more than 90 percent, causing global famine that would kill billions by starvation. In most countries less than a quarter of the population survives by the end of year two in this scenario. Global fish stocks are decimated and the ozone layer collapses."
More here and links to the studies.
https://allianceforscience.cornell....urvive-a-nuclear-war-between-nato-and-russia/
In a full scale nuclear war the lucky will be those who die instantly. I hope I would be one them.
The following is based on a war between US/West and Russia/China involving 4,400 warheads, equivalent to roughly half the current inventories.
In a full scale nuclear war the lucky will be those who die instantly. I hope I would be one them.
The following is based on a war between US/West and Russia/China involving 4,400 warheads, equivalent to roughly half the current inventories.
I don't see how with ~0.3-1 MT warheads much of anything is getting into the stratosphere to cause a serious enough problem with the climate. Our cities also (rather importantly) aren't made of wood like Hiroshima or Nagasaki were which I believe perturbs these studies, then also the matter of the strategic benefits of air-burst detonation to maximise damage reducing the threat from radiation/soot further.
Still wouldn't want to be in a city or near strategically important sites obviously, but I think the risk is overstated which if it weren't then we'd be better prepared to reinforce society/trade structures instead of thinking it'd all collapse 'so why bother'.
*Russia Says One Sailor Died and 27 More Are Missing After Missile Cruiser Moskva Sank, Says 396 Crew Were Rescued — RIA News Agency
*Russia Grants Belarus a One-Year Grace Period for More Than $1 bln of Loans, RIA News Agency Cites Belarus Finance Ministry As Saying
Did anyone else notice the size of Putin's right thumb?
![]()
It's brilliant. You can go round and count the mice.There's a "Secret Nuclear Bunker" just up the road near Nantwich at Hack Green. Open to the public for a fee, and used for amateur radio the rest of the time. I bet the keyholder keeps them on him at the momentI think some have been sold off for bizarre housing projects for troglodytes.
Another was used by druggies to grow a huge amount of cannabis as those in charge had forgotten to turn the three phase power supply from the grid off... I wonder if there are any that are still fully functional?
we have nowhere to emerge from, we're all dust.
wether maintained or not, it's still a shelter for not being vaporised, it's another day etc etc etc of life. this is escalating every
day, there has been no day when this has'nt been escalating. Satan missle test yesterday hmmm maybe he's bluffing, yeah
nothing to worry about.
Agreed. People need to calm it down.Russia stated they wouldn't use nuclear weapons unless they faced an existential threat, they aren't crazy enough to perform a nuclear first strike on NATO, the only outcome for them would be immediate annihilation. It is a scary time but people should control their anxiety around this.
Russia stated they wouldn't use nuclear weapons unless they faced an existential threat, they aren't crazy enough to perform a nuclear first strike on NATO, the only outcome for them would be immediate annihilation. It is a scary time but people should control their anxiety around this.
Russia stated they wouldn't use nuclear weapons unless they faced an existential threat, they aren't crazy enough to perform a nuclear first strike on NATO, the only outcome for them would be immediate annihilation. It is a scary time but people should control their anxiety around this.