Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2005
- Posts
- 12,683
That's a "MADE IN USSR" marking, which means one of three things:
That's a "MADE IN USSR" marking, which means one of three things:
(1) This tyre was sat in a warehouse for over 30 years prior to this invasion and they had to use it due to their shortages.
(2) It's one that was exported to China/India over 30 years ago that got imported back due to their shortage.
(3) It was the vehicles spare and nobody thought to replace it in the last 30+ years.
There is no good answer xD
Thoughts on his reliability in general? I pretty much knew everything he said in this vid beforehand, and I feel more and more like that with his most recent videos. Why I gravitated to him was he debunked 2 theories from Youtubers I respected.
Eurgh this doesn't read well to me.
Potentially abusive men are using a UK scheme to host Ukrainian refugees - to contact vulnerable women, BBC News has learned.
The men, some with a reported history of violence, message the women on Facebook groups specially set up to connect sponsors and hosts.
Some refugees have also become homeless after relations with hosts broke down or because housing was not well vetted.
But a UK government official said safeguards were in place.
BBC
I've generally found Perun knows his stuff, with some great insight in some areas and ability to deep dive certain aspects a lot of people can't - but he does have his blind spots - there are some specific areas he gets stuck in conventional/highly logical thinking in a situation where things are treading newly unpredictable ground, etc.
You are omitting the possibility the press to stamp out the marking hasn't been changed in 30 years ... but I do prefer your answers.
The Chieftain did a `react` to his `Are tanks useless` type video - the answer is the same as in WW2 - unsupported tanks will die. Yes the means to hard kill armour has been updated (Javelin vs 17lb er) but the ethos is the same; send a metal box with limited visability to an area where a soldier can hide with a rocket / barrell , and the tankwont last long. Sweep the route with infantry and have long range high ex death / CAS cover and the same mobile armour artillery is in a better place.
I've generally found Perun knows his stuff, with some great insight in some areas and ability to deep dive certain aspects a lot of people can't - but he does have his blind spots - there are some specific areas he gets stuck in conventional/highly logical thinking in a situation where things are treading newly unpredictable ground, etc.
Before the introduction of kevlar reinforcements and high performance compounds as well. In some remote corner of Siberia the USSR probably still exists.That would be fine if the tyres weren't literally rotting away. We've seen numerous pictures and videos of tyre failures so I think it's safe to assume these are very old tyres from storage. I'm sure they were supposed to be replaced but some General needed to do some renovation work on his villa.
Don't think I've seen that video - though I have watched The Chieftain's earlier video covering the subject.
Yeah, I saw that video. The same answer to Perun and that War on the Rocks article: if not the tank, what? If you need something to zerg rush a position, take a hit, and fires faster than a missile, what else do you use? If I was infantry trying to take a heavily fortified position, do I want to be in an APC, humvee, or M1 block 3 with protections like Trophy, and as a last resort, white phosphorous smoke?The Chieftain did a `react` to his `Are tanks useless` type video - the answer is the same as in WW2 - unsupported tanks will die. Yes the means to hard kill armour has been updated (Javelin vs 17lb er) but the ethos is the same; send a metal box with limited visability to an area where a soldier can hide with a rocket / barrell , and the tankwont last long. Sweep the route with infantry and have long range high ex death / CAS cover and the same mobile armour artillery is in a better place.
You mean like suggesting Taiwan or similar countries should invest in drones and shoulder-launched missiles, instead of conventional equipment? The sinking of the Moskva would suggest a more balanced approach.I've generally found Perun knows his stuff, with some great insight in some areas and ability to deep dive certain aspects a lot of people can't - but he does have his blind spots - there are some specific areas he gets stuck in conventional/highly logical thinking in a situation where things are treading newly unpredictable ground, etc.