got problems in your country? show how manly you are.I've heard that sort of argument before and it just strikes me as being complete BS, Putin knows full well the flippin EU isn't going to mount an invasion.
In fairness here, the main reason Russia are scared of NATO on their border is specifically because the West and Europe in particular (technically France and Germany in particular) have a habit of invading them. You and I know that's not likely to happen again, and definitely not anytime soon, but I can see why the average Russian may consider it a realistic concern. If you lose 30 million people to invading forces in three world wars started by western Europe the natural result is to become wary of western Europen.
I've heard that sort of argument before and it just strikes me as being complete BS, Putin knows full well the flippin EU isn't going to mount an invasion.
It's like saying Poland should be worried about a German invasion right now or we should be worried about the Spanish and French navies etc... All countries in Europe have been at war or faced the threat of invasion during the same time periods, there isn't anything special about Russia there.
They don't like that those countries have fallen within the Western sphere of influence, it highlights their own failings, previously it was communism where they were desperate to keep the citizens of the Soviet Union separate and now it's this sort of dictatorship/gangster government under Putin.
Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania are all success stories, they don't want Belarus and Ukraine to go that way and become aligned with the west, become more successful too - the threat isn't one of military invasion, the threat is the domestic issues and pro-western or pro-liberal opposition leaders gaining prominence and undermining the current regime under Putin.
Ukraine is a larger country and Ukrainians have strong cultural links to Russia, if they become more successful and more secure (and can't be intimidated as easily via NATO membership) then that can influence things domestically in Russia.
They've kept domestic opposition in check so far in part with control of the media, corrupt elections etc.. but a stronger, pro-Western opposition is a possible outcome from Ukraine going that way. Also the revolutions, they're **** scared of what they saw in Ukraine in the Orange revolution in 2004 and the Maidan revolution in 2014 (that's what triggered the military reaction really), that's the other risk if the Russia population starts becoming more pro-Western, influenced by neighbours, they might still be able to fiddle election results but if you have a mass of popular support for change within the population then rigged elections aren't always enough, that sort of revolution is a big risk for them too.
Everything else seems like a weak excuse in comparison, it's a corrupt dictatorship and corrupt dictatorships are especially worried about being overthrown/kicked out of power.
so what your saying is we need to rebuild hadrians wall or at-least put an army next to it.Russia started ww2 with Germany when they invaded Poland,granted 16 days late to the let's invade Europe party but hey ho how easy it is to forget history.
They were not the victims in ww2 they decided to play the invasion game and invaded west first.
Napoleon was how bloody long ago? Maybe we should be afraid of the bloody Scandinavians and especially the Italians here in the UK ? How far back do we go to excuse our paranoid delusions etc?
Yup, because the West and Europe in particular are gearing up for invasion.
while we know "the West and Europe in particular" aren't gearing up for an invasion, Russia believes that we are
What you say is technically correct from a purely literal point of view but it completely ignores the context of the events.They were not the victims in ww2 they decided to play the invasion game and invaded west first.
Well said
I doubt it tbh.. Putin might be a bit odd at times but he's not completely demented.
What you say is technically correct from a purely literal point of view but it completely ignores the context of the events.
Russia did help Germany invade Poland, but they only did it as a way to appease Germany and avoid being invaded themselves sooner than they were. And they only did it after Britain and France refused to join a mutual defence pact with them against the Nazis.
I doubt it tbh.. Putin might be a bit odd at times but he's not completely demented.
I've heard that sort of argument before and it just strikes me as being complete BS, Putin knows full well the flippin EU isn't going to mount an invasion.
He may not be, but objectively I can fully see how from his point of view (and the overall Russian point of view) us admitting Ukraine (or Georgia) into NATO would be a defacto declaration of war. At the end of the day NATO was founded as a "lets gang up on Russia" club hence why they formed the Warsaw pact in response (actually their first response was to ask to join NATO, but they were told no because, you know "lets gang up on Russia" club).
A lot of people aren't looking at this objectively and are just taking a "We wouldn't invade Russia, they shouldn't care if Ukraine joined NATO or had loads of NATO troops there, they're just being silly" stance. But there's a very simple way to analogise the issue from our point of view and how we would react:
In the 60's NATO/WSP almost went to war because the USSR built missile silos in Cuba, they were told that any approaching ships would be sunk (to stop them getting warheads there). If instead there were no silos and the USSR had announced that Cuba was joining the USSR as the Soviet Socialist Republic of Cuba then the USA would have invaded Cuba immediately, overthrown Castro and set up a huge US military presence. They would have seen it as a defacto declaration of war by Cuba and Cuba as a legitimate military threat/target just like Russia would if we let Ukraine join NATO.
What you say is technically correct from a purely literal point of view but it completely ignores the context of the events.
Russia did help Germany invade Poland, but they only did it as a way to appease Germany and avoid being invaded themselves sooner than they were. And they only did it after Britain and France refused to join a mutual defence pact with them against the Nazis.
Putin does not think EU or US will invade Russia. He's just selling it to the population to remain popular. It goes down very well because we screw up so much and do nasty things while pretending we're the good guys.
Then we finally all completely ignore that the reason Hitler even came about is because we decided to bankrupt Germany for decades on purpose as result of WW1. Then we were all shocked that ultra-nationalistic guy who rose up on hatred for everyone came about.
Later they became our allies and "Uncle Joe" became a friend in name at anyrate.
What you say is technically correct from a purely literal point of view but it completely ignores the context of the events.
Russia did help Germany invade Poland, but they only did it as a way to appease Germany and avoid being invaded themselves sooner than they were. And they only did it after Britain and France refused to join a mutual defence pact with them against the Nazis.
Is this before or after they let the Nazis make panzers and train in Soviet territory??? Love the Soviet victimisation of ww2
Once again you are ripping things out of context. Yes Soviets and Nazis did share technology and trade. US while not directly but assisted Hitler through companies like Chase, FORD and IBM. Chase bank literally was funding nazi war machine through selling of bonds in US.
Meanwhile UK literally agreed to give away territory to Nazis during appeasement without any word of those countries. Imagine the hubris, literally giving away countries in europe that you have no control or anything over.
https://historyofyesterday.com/thre...amelessly-supported-nazi-germany-58fe33910303
Yes Soviets trading with Nazis was bad. However, everyone else was at it and at the time it was seen to be normal.
Standard Oil literally provided Nazis technology to turn coal into oil. Then proceeded to supply them with oil when ww2 was in full swing.
Yep. If you just ignore all context…then yep they invaded Poland….also Germany in ‘45.
You win the debate…coz you set the parameters.
He may not be, but objectively I can fully see how from his point of view (and the overall Russian point of view) us admitting Ukraine (or Georgia) into NATO would be a defacto declaration of war. At the end of the day NATO was founded as a "lets gang up on Russia" club hence why they formed the Warsaw pact in response (actually their first response was to ask to join NATO, but they were told no because, you know "lets gang up on Russia" club).
A lot of people aren't looking at this objectively and are just taking a "We wouldn't invade Russia, they shouldn't care if Ukraine joined NATO or had loads of NATO troops there, they're just being silly" stance. But there's a very simple way to analogise the issue from our point of view and how we would react:
In the 60's NATO/WSP almost went to war because the USSR built missile silos in Cuba, they were told that any approaching ships would be sunk (to stop them getting warheads there). If instead there were no silos and the USSR had announced that Cuba was joining the USSR as the Soviet Socialist Republic of Cuba then the USA would have invaded Cuba immediately, overthrown Castro and set up a huge US military presence. They would have seen it as a defacto declaration of war by Cuba and Cuba as a legitimate military threat/target just like Russia would if we let Ukraine join NATO.