Deleted User 298457
Deleted User 298457
It isn't free. Ukraine will be "owned" by the US for the next millennia.
Ukraine Invasion - Please do not post videos showing attacks/similar
- Thread starter areksnumbr1sxylady
- Start date
- Status
Soldato
- Joined
- 3 Oct 2007
- Posts
- 12,169
- Location
- London, UK
Yes yes we know you'd bend the knee to Vlad. Fortunately Ukrainians have bigger balls and want to fight for their country.
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 3 Oct 2007
- Posts
- 12,169
- Location
- London, UK
No more than they owned the UK after WW2. Ukraine has plenty of resources and yes the US will get its money back and good terms on Ukrainian resources to pay the debt.
Soldato
- Joined
- 3 Oct 2007
- Posts
- 12,169
- Location
- London, UK
Wow has he aged in 3 years.
Morocco is selling 120 x T72B tanks and some spare parts to Ukraine for 90 million Euro, paid for by the U.S and Netherlands. The first batch arrives in Ukraine next week
www.military.africa
Morocco choose sides, supplies T-72B tanks to Ukraine
Morocco is jettisoning it's neutral stance in the Russian-Ukraine conflict, to supply arms to Kiev. Rabat had earlier chosen to
www.military.africa
Last edited:
Associate
- Joined
- 1 Oct 2007
- Posts
- 950
- Location
- Hawkes Bay , NZ
Just gets better and better. The guy is a saint...
Ukraine war: Russia not to blame for conflict - Putin
President Vladimir Putin says he still continues to see Ukraine as a brotherly nation.
www.bbc.com
Not even close to being crap.
Whilst it's certainly not as great as other rifles in the civilian world (where it's mostly been reviewed negatively by YT channels I really like) Ukraine is a dirty trench filled type of warfare and the AK-12, despite not being as good as other weapons, is still perfectly acceptable for any modern military to use.
I was reading that the Russians could collapse around Bakhmut within weeks as they centered there attacks and lost so many and will start to get probed and picked off.
I think there some surprises in store within the next few weeks.
Just gets better and better. The guy is a saint...
Ukraine war: Russia not to blame for conflict - Putin
President Vladimir Putin says he still continues to see Ukraine as a brotherly nation.www.bbc.com
And yet people still believe him in the west unfortunately.
It boggles the brain cells how they actually think he's telling the truth!
Last edited:
/cloudfront-us-east-2.images.arcpublishing.com/reuters/QGVQZSIEF5ICBP4KULZVOXLJDE.jpg)
Exclusive: Biden hits Russia's Wagner group with tough new export curbs
The Biden administration on Wednesday unveiled new curbs on technology exports to Russia's Wagner military group, in a bid to further choke off supplies to the contractor over its role in the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
www.reuters.com
WSJ News Exclusive | France’s Macron Calls on Europe to Reduce Reliance on U.S. for Security
The French president stressed that he doesn’t see his push to develop European defense as an alternative to NATO.
www.wsj.com
*Biden: US Welcomed 221000 Ukraine Refugees Since March
*Biden: We Know Putin Has No Intention of Stopping 'This Cruel War'
*Biden: Zelenskiy Has Made Clear He's Open To Pursuing Peace
*Biden: Will Sign Defense Policy Bill
*Biden: U.S. Announcing New $1.85 bln Security Assistance Package
*Biden: Patriot Battery Will Be Critical Asset for Ukraine, Training May Take Some Time
*Biden: Russia Purposefully Attacking Key Ukraine Infrastructure
*Biden: US, Allies Working To Strengthen Ukraine's Energy Grid
*Zelenskiy: Want To Thank Congress For Bipartisan Support
*Zelenskiy: U.S. Patriot Missile System Will Significantly Strengthen Country's Air Defences
*Zelenskiy: Patriot Missile System is Important Step to Creating Effective Air Defence and Thereby Deprive Russians of Ability to Strike at Energy System
*Zelenskiy: Regardless of Changes in U.S. Congress, He is Confident Ukraine Will Continue to Enjoy Bipartisan Support
*Zelenskiy: We Have a Clear Understanding of How Our Defence Capabilities Will Be Strengthened in Months to Come, Says He Can't Give Details
*Biden: Not at All Worried About Holding International Coalition Together
*Biden: Feel Very Good About the Solidarity of Support for Ukraine
*Zelenskiy: 'Just Peace' is No Compromises as to the Sovereignty and Territorial Integrity of Ukraine
*Biden: U.S. Shares Same Vision for Free, Independent, Prosperous Ukraine
*Biden: If and When Zelenskiy is Ready to Talk to Russians, He Will Succeed as He Has on the Battlefield
*Biden: Ukraine Can Continue Success on Battlefield With US Help
*Biden on Putin: “He’s Going to Fail. He’s Already Failed."
*Biden: Patriot Missile Battery Is a Defensive System, Not Escalatory
Last edited:
He's lying for domestic propaganda amongst people kept ignorant of the outside world. Nobody with even the vaguest glimmer of a clue could believe most of what he says. NATO's full potential is multiple orders of magnitude greater than what it's given to Ukraine. NATO isn't directly involved in the war at all! Putin also said that the invasion of Ukraine he ordered wasn't his fault and that he regards Ukraine as a brother state. Since he did order the invasion and did so with the publically stated intent of eradicating Ukraine entirely by absorbing it into Russia and is still trying to do so, his lies are obvious. But only to people with even the vaguest glimmer of a clue. There are a lot of people in Russia who at least partially believe him because his propaganda is the only source of information they have.
For example, everyone else knows that NATO has no interest in invading and defeating Russia. We know that because it could do so and hasn't. We might not have known that before this war exposed how weak Russia's military capabilities really are, but we know it now. With Russia's full military potential and no rules of engagement it can't even defeat Ukraine with limited help from NATO and with its hands tied by strict rules of engagement that prevent it fighting back effectively. Ukraine could probably defeat Russia if it was allowed to do so, let alone the full potential of NATO. The USA by itself certainly could. Not conquer. Possibly occupy. But definitely defeat. But it won't because it doesn't want to and never did. What would be the point? NATO's fault my arse.
Last edited:
On a negative side also, it has highlighted deficiencies in NATOs stocks and some of its equipments performance if we ever ended up in a slogging match.
Granted that being on the "winning side" so to speak means we can learn and plug those deficiencies quite easily, but it has highlighted issues that need to be addressed. Particularly if the likes of China decide they want some action.
He has indeed become very adept at statecraft.
Would not surprise me if on his way home he ends up taking a quick pop into no 10...
His comment on aid not being charity was pure genius.
No deficiency"s take nukes out the equation and it would be over. Air support has not even factored in this war.
- Status