Soldato
- Joined
- 16 Aug 2009
- Posts
- 7,956
Failures still occur though Fukushima's plants blew up because they couldn't get cooling water because of the tsunami theres always some point of failure that gets overlookedCommon situation? War?
Earthquakes can be accounted for, as they are in all buildings, human error not an issue, I work in a regulated industry where a single point of failure is never allowed, so assume an even more regulated industry would also treat critical points of failure the same.
They don't however render the surrounding areas unsafe for human visitation for centuries afterwards thoughIt always amuses me a bit that people bring up the failure of Fukushima, something that could have been largely prevented if the entire country wasn't wrecked, by "simply" getting in some generators to maintain the cooling as it was still operating safely in it's emergency shut down mode until the batteries for the cooling failed and the on site generators failed to kick in because they'd been flooded.
Meanwhile in Japan loads of "safer" energy related facilities had gone up and instantly killed people/caused lots of environmental damage, things like oil refineries and storage plants, chemical processing plants etc all failed in the initial earthquake that the "dangerous and scary" nuclear reactor survived.
I love how nuclear supporters completely ignore the waste which is dangerous for a very, very long time its carbon free certainly but claiming its clean is misleading at best.If you want cheap energy go Gas, I don't recall anyone of any authority say nuclear is cheap. The benefits of nuclear is once the reactor is fueled you don't need to worry about getting regular supplies like you do with gas and coal, it's works constantly and it's not directly effected by weather and the electricity it generates is clean.