Ukraine Invasion - Please do not post videos showing attacks/similar

Status
Not open for further replies.
No way to know when those videos were taken but weather is consistent with current conditions:

RGLn8I7.png


I can't be bothered to sit watching live cams from that area to see if more military stuff is on the move in the next hours or days.
 
Does Russia think that camera footage purporting to show tanks and troops leaving would convince NATO who have satellite and drone surveillance, mobile radar, overflights etc., it may suit to provide footage for the media however it is a little naive to base a campaign on news camera footage.
 
Nato need to have a chat with Rroff, he seems to know everything that is going on in that region.

Like Jack Bauer with a keyboard this lad!
 
alchal said:
https://mobile.twitter.com/EilishHart/status/1493686750882975756?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed|twterm^1493686750882975756|twgr^|twcon^s1_&ref_url=https://www.tanknet.org/index.php?app=coremodule=systemcontroller=embedurl=https://twitter.com/EilishHart/status/1493686750882975756?s=19

France and Germany apparently wanted Ukraine to cave to russian demands.
So France and Germany trying to bend Ukraine over and take it so they can look like the saviours?
Click to expand...
If this is true, then the rest of NATO should deride them for it.
 
Hagar said:
Does Russia think that camera footage purporting to show tanks and troops leaving would convince NATO who have satellite and drone surveillance, mobile radar, overflights etc., it may suit to provide footage for the media however it is a little naive to base a campaign on news camera footage.
Click to expand...


It's a classic communist trick, they are still living in the Cold War mindset. They think they can trick the enemy with pre recorded video footage, just like China tries to trick the west by showing video of tennis player alive and well and video of Muslims saying they are happy to be free of allah
 
Josh said:
Nato need to have a chat with Rroff, he seems to know everything that is going on in that region.

Like Jack Bauer with a keyboard this lad!
Click to expand...

These days you practically could know everything going on from behind a screen if you dedicated yourself to it :s

There are live streams everywhere even in Russia around military areas, even Google street view in a fair bit of Russia, getting hold of real time high res satellite imagery is a bit trickier and/or unless you have a lot of money to spend you don't have rights to distribute it. A lot can be inferred from SAR data, etc. though fairly recent imagery is often available with a bit of digging.

So much information online - I rarely do more than skim the top of it let alone deep dive analyse it.
 
Rroff said:
These days you practically could know everything going on from behind a screen if you dedicated yourself to it :s

There are live streams everywhere even in Russia around military areas, even Google street view in a fair bit of Russia, getting hold of real time high res satellite imagery is a bit trickier and/or unless you have a lot of money to spend you don't have rights to distribute it. A lot can be inferred from SAR data, etc. though fairly recent imagery is often available with a bit of digging.

So much information online - I rarely do more than skim the top of it let alone deep dive analyse it.
Click to expand...

NGL it's very impressive.

I don't have the mental capacity to take on this entire saga so reading the updates here is filling that void.
 
Josh said:
NGL it's very impressive.

I don't have the mental capacity to take on this entire saga so reading the updates here is filling that void.
Click to expand...

Personally I just skim a bunch of sources, see what seems reasonable as an interpretation balancing the different biases, etc. fill in some gaps with what seems likely. As a generalisation it is usually right or close enough.
 
TNA said:
I prefer DuckDuckGo ;)
Click to expand...

There is a ton of stuff which never really makes it to search engines.

One of the things I hate is local news sites, etc. where there is so much **** on their pages little useful turns up on Google hits and the site's own search engine just basically brings some generic hits up - so if you search for an article you saw a few months back it can be a headache :( even the BBC can be bad for that - saw an article recently and wanted to refer to it a just a few days later, had dropped off the recent articles list for the relevant section, and using the search terms from the headline and even unique keywords relevant to the article would not bring up the page on the BBC's search or Google just some loosely connected articles :( eventually found it by remembering the name of someone mentioned in the article and looking up what they'd published.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom