Caporegime
Ignore i missreadGreat stuff, cluster bombs will do wonders on those russian trenches by scattering little bombs all over and inside the trenches
Last edited:
Ignore i missreadGreat stuff, cluster bombs will do wonders on those russian trenches by scattering little bombs all over and inside the trenches
If that goes pop, everybody loses.
That's what makes it such a popcorn moment.
I have long said that Russia just might do something like this and use it as an excuse to get out of Ukraine. Putin needs an exit clause. Will he use this? And what if he does? There are rumours that NATO might use this as a reason to actually go in. What will happen if they do? It's all edge of the seat stuff.
As for radiation, it's seriously over-hyped. It's not as dangerous as everyone thinks. But sure will get the media hyped up.
Perhaps they mean non-ionising radiation, such as visible light?Why isn't radiation that dangerous? Serious question.
Why isn't radiation that dangerous? Serious question.
There is a growing consensus in the scientific community that the USA's initial findings after Hiroshima and Nagasaki were incorrect. What they did was to plot a graph of how much damage was caused to a human if they were exposed to radiation, and then project that backwards to estimate deaths for lesser doses. The problem is that the human body seems to be resilient to lower doses, meaning that the fatality rate is much lower than they expected. In fact, in Chernobyl, only something like eight people died from exposure - except for the people who received massive doses from entering the building itself.
The predictions were much, much higher.
Mother Nature has thrived in the Chernobyl, showing far fewer adverse effects than expected.
Plus, the fact that blowing up a nuclear reactor isn't that dangerous. It will just spread fuel all over the place. Not nice, for sure, but there are far worse things.
The deaths you've reported are only from the immediate days after.
Weren't cancer rates across Europe significantly higher after Chernobyl? I find only 8 deaths hard to believe.There is a growing consensus in the scientific community that the USA's initial findings after Hiroshima and Nagasaki were incorrect. What they did was to plot a graph of how much damage was caused to a human if they were exposed to radiation, and then project that backwards to estimate deaths for lesser doses. The problem is that the human body seems to be resilient to lower doses, meaning that the fatality rate is much lower than they expected. In fact, in Chernobyl, only something like eight people died from exposure - except for the people who received massive doses from entering the building itself.
The predictions were much, much higher.
Mother Nature has thrived in the Chernobyl, showing far fewer adverse effects than expected.
Plus, the fact that blowing up a nuclear reactor isn't that dangerous. It will just spread fuel all over the place. Not nice, for sure, but there are far worse things.
Food and consumer goods giant Unilever set to suspend all imports and exports of products to Russia.
https://www.reuters.com/article/ukraine-crisis-companies-idCNL3N2VB3OZ
Tiny in comparison to the deleterious effects that huffing all this pollution has done.I'm not sure those numbers are correct, with 6000 out of the 60,000 involved in the cleanup died. Reports of riased cancer, birth defects from people within the zone in the years after.
The deaths you've reported are only from the immediate days after.
There are no lies, and no one has to obey anyone, hell if you want to be pro Russian fine but at least have the balls to be straight about it, that's your choice I'm not stopping you. the only propaganda is that every couple of weeks there's another poster spouting the same Kremlin line about poor Russian soldiers, almost like clockwork.
so poor deflection 0.5/10
Let's check in on how that's going
Unilever doubles profits in Russia, but says it didn’t break earlier promises
Unilver doubled its profits in Russia over the past year, despite promises to scale down its operations there to selling only essential food and hygiene products, Follow the Money reports. The company also spent more on advertising in Russia, even though it said it would stop advertising in the...nltimes.nl
Unilever named ‘international sponsor of war’ by Ukraine
Protest at London HQ highlights taxes company pays in Russia and new law requiring it to contribute to war effortwww.theguardian.com
Oh...
No, they weren't.
Great stuff, cluster bombs will do wonders on those russian trenches by scattering little bombs all over and inside the trenches
Weren't cancer rates across Europe significantly higher after Chernobyl? I find only 8 deaths hard to believe.
So is blowing up nurseries, schools, & old peoples homes but that hasn't stopped the Russians.I thought cluster bombs were banned/ a very bad look? They have high rates of sticking around long after the war and end up killing a load of civilians etc? I remember we routinely chastised gaddafi and assad for using them?
Seems unfair on future Ukrainians that will live in fear of this.
At the risk of going off topic, how do you work out such a low death rate? Do you not include the ongoing damage radiation does to life?
I thought cluster bombs were banned/ a very bad look? They have high rates of sticking around long after the war and end up killing a load of civilians etc? I remember we routinely chastised gaddafi and assad for using them?
Seems unfair on future Ukrainians that will live in fear of this.
I thought cluster bombs were banned/ a very bad look? They have high rates of sticking around long after the war and end up killing a load of civilians etc? I remember we routinely chastised gaddafi and assad for using them?
Seems unfair on future Ukrainians that will live in fear of this.