I thought all 6 cores at the reactor were already in cold shutdown - 5 since the invasion and the 6th when the russians blew the dam?
That's not how you prepare the accident.
I thought all 6 cores at the reactor were already in cold shutdown - 5 since the invasion and the 6th when the russians blew the dam?
A taliban interview called it steel rainjesus. that's quite terrifyingly impressive, i imagine anything in that area is going to have a very very crappy day.
That looks like it is good or large concentrations of troops/light armor etc. Curious how that will work with trenches.A taliban interview called it steel rain
They aren't snuff videos tho that's where YOUR obvious lie is exposed, using a false but emotive word IS propaganda, it's straight out of a Russian bot farm play book.
I don't care if you're being paid or just stupidly parroting your favourite internet dumb dumb.
now you're making stuff up nobodies getting joy from killing, least of all me, you're making up lies. What's with all the obey stuff, do you think I'm part of the matrix, lol.
Calling Russian bot etc seems to be this threads goto insult if you disagree with someone, whether warranted or not.You lie about the people who think that snuff videos are a bad thing and falsely accuse them of being Kremlim propagandists, a Russian bot farm, etc, etc.
We're talking about people watching videos of people being killed in order to gain pleasure from watching people being killed. That's the sole topic of this argument - people gaining pleasure from watching people being killed. The phrase "snuff video" is entirely appropriate.
Some people think that snuff videos are a bad thing.
You lie about the people who think that snuff videos are a bad thing and falsely accuse them of being Kremlim propagandists, a Russian bot farm, etc, etc.
EDIT: I missed another blatantly untrue statement from you. This thread is full of people openly boasting about gaining pleasure from watching videos of people being killed. I could provide dozens if not hundreds of examples. How many do you want?
Can NATO sustain a war with Russia or China? Is the wests production capabilities especially for modern military hardware up to the job? Not an argumentative question just curious for answers from people with more knowledge of these things.
EDIT: conventional war, remove nuclear option.
They still need cooling when the russians bombed the power network they had to rely on backup diesel generators. As for what happens if they overheat, lord knows but it's probably not good /sI thought all 6 cores at the reactor were already in cold shutdown - 5 since the invasion and the 6th when the russians blew the dam?
No-one is sending NATO troops into russian controlled or anywhere else territory a serving british soldier was jailed lately for going AWOL to fight in Ukraine an regular NATO soldier fighting against russians would be major diplomatic incident and a major propaganda coup for Putin the west does not want loose cannons triggering WW3 all by themselvesMy guess is that they *might* send in a contingency to secure the reactor and make it safe, on the grounds that it represents a real danger to Nato countries. They would not fire on Russians unless they fired first. They would demand Russian troops leave the area, but I doubt this would be a problem since the Russians would have course have no protective gear.
That looks like it is good or large concentrations of troops/light armor etc. Curious how that will work with trenches.
I've maybe seen 1 poster say they enjoyed seeing Russians die.
I would suggest you look again, but I doubt you will, not through malice etc but just due to the sheer amount of posts in here now making it almost impossible to search through. However, I know with 100% certainty that there's easily over a dozen posts from people who've openly said they wanted Russian POW's murdered (after the 1st castration vid), all 140 million Russian men, women and children killed, even Serbia to be invaded and wiped of the map killing another 7m all because the poster "thought" Serbia supported Russia etc etc, most of which I quoted.
If you wish to believe that only 1 poster in here gets excited by seeing drone footage of Russians dying, I would suggest you are very, very naive to put in kindly.
Still not a snuff video, I accuse people of using Kremlin propagandist talking points, when they use Kremlin propagandist talking points. like, the evil west is enjoying snuff videos of poor Russian defenders of freedom.We're talking about people watching videos of people being killed in order to gain pleasure from watching people being killed. That's the sole topic of this argument - people gaining pleasure from watching people being killed. The phrase "snuff video" is entirely appropriate.
Some people think that snuff videos are a bad thing.
You lie about the people who think that snuff videos are a bad thing and falsely accuse them of being Kremlim propagandists, a Russian bot farm, etc, etc.
EDIT: I missed another blatantly untrue statement from you. This thread is full of people openly boasting about gaining pleasure from watching videos of people being killed. I could provide dozens if not hundreds of examples. How many do you want?
Still not a snuff video, I accuse people of using Kremlin propagandist talking points, when they use Kremlin propagandist talking points. like, the evil west is enjoying snuff videos of poor Russian defenders of freedom.
It doesn't matter if you actually are the idiot bot farm, or you are the useful idiot parroting the bot farm.
the only people I see enjoying ALL the death happening in Ukraine are people that like sitting on their red pill high horses of righteousness, you seem to be getting some sort of weird kick out of it.
ISIS execution videos are snuff videos. Mexican cartel execution videos are snuff videos. The Wagner solider that had his head caved in with a sledge hammer is a snuff video. They are all barbaric videos. Videos of war where soldiers happen to die are not snuff videos.
I've maybe seen 1 poster say they enjoyed seeing Russians die.
I want Russia to lose or should I say I want Ukraine to win. Part of losing a war is losing soldiers and equipment. The more Russia loses the better it is for Ukraine. I'd much rather Russia just packed up and went home but they aren't doing that, they are raping and pillaging Ukraine, they are bombing civilian targets, they are castrating POWs. No one is making them rape, no one is making them castrate POWs. No one is making them murder civilians. I hope they all surrender but many don't, some even fake surrender and then try and kill the soldiers offering them surrender with a grenade. At this point they are little better than German SS soldiers or Japanese solider in the Pacific in my eyes. If you are looking for sympathy for these people you are likely in the wrong thread.
Wow, that’s probably the most sensible thing you have written in this threadI think the US would have production issues against China in a land war, but that can't really happen, so where are they fighting? The US vs China is predominantly a Naval and Air campaign, neither country can really attack each others main land. Fighting over Taiwan would see the US Navy win a costly war, but they would be able to sustain naval and air operations until they won. This scenario has been played out a lot recently in high level military simulators and that was the consensus.
NATO vs Russia is heavily one sided in favour of the NATO, there's no production issues, the Russian military would be an ineffective fighting force within 1 month. It would be an unfair fight almost.
for the record, you're a ****, comment on the content, not the poster. but FYI it's called mocking by imitation, a buzzword propagandist whose only other resort is to stoop to calling lair lair like a 4-year-old.
but thanks for the intelligent input, darling.