Soldato
To add salt into the wound it would appear Ukraine is on the front foot just south of Bakhmut pushing towards Odradivka.
Thats a monstrosity! This makes carrying ECM Blue look light. If it works though I guess its not stupid. Wouldnt want to be the lad carrying that though, prime target No1 for Ukr Snipers.Seems to be tacticool for an antidrone infantry
We did it repeatedly for extended periods of time in Afghanistan. I'd like to say it didnt effect me. Well at least it didnt fry my swimmers...What could possibly go wrong from wearing likely extreme frequency equipment at close range for extended periods?
Thats a monstrosity! This makes carrying ECM Blue look light. If it works though I guess its not stupid. Wouldnt want to be the lad carrying that though, prime target No1 for Ukr Snipers.
We did it repeatedly for extended periods of time in Afghanistan. I'd like to say it didnt effect me. Well at least it didnt fry my swimmers...
I cant go into any specific detail, its been a while but the specifics are probably still technically secret. But yes all foot patrols, and vehicles had ECM covering multiple freq/bandwidths to combat remote IED's. Drones wernt a threat there but the principle is the same. This isnt new tech and it can be VERY effective, I will caveat that with "if its done right" something I dont have any faith Russia is capable of.With high frequency jammers? Didn't know we did that. Good info.
For a static object yeah probably unless the drone has some sort of auto loss of command system, where it goes into hover/orbit/return to home mode etc I'm not sure what the systems they are using, or how they would be effected.Isn't it kind of pointless if the drone already has an attack vector?
I think this would be the huge limiting factor for usefulness, especially in the trenches/forward reaches of the front line. its not like they are working out of FOB's/CP's with free access to charging facilities. I suspect even if this stuff is fielded it will be to elite units or even just used in static positions to cover high ranking officers etc.I'm not sure range is as much an issue as battery life on those things
I don't think it's so bad for static positions like trenches, you could use larger batteries and have some on rotation with solar recharging, the issue is for infantry they can only carry so much before they're ineffectiveI think this would be the huge limiting factor for usefulness, especially in the trenches/forward reaches of the front line. its not like they are working out of FOB's/CP's with free access to charging facilities. I suspect even if this stuff is fielded it will be to elite units or even just used in static positions to cover high ranking officers etc.
The French gendarmerie would like to speak to two tourists who may have information regarding this incident.Marina Ovsyannikova: Russian TV journalist known for on-air Ukraine war protest falls ill after suspected poisoning
Marina Ovsyannikova gained international attention last March after bursting into a studio of Russian state TV, her then employer, to denounce the war in Ukraine. She later said she had no regrets about her actions.news.sky.com
Not Polonium time again surely?The French gendarmerie would like to speak to two tourists who may have information regarding this incident.
seriously?Do we have 20k troops to spare ?
The French gendarmerie would like to speak to two tourists who may have information regarding this incident.
Not Polonium time again surely?
What could possibly go wrong from wearing likely extreme frequency equipment at close range for extended periods? (not to mention you just become a beacon for a missile with the emissions)
Ask his generals
not to mention you just become a beacon for a missile with the emissions
Seems to be tacticool for an antidrone infantry