That's a can of worms it really doesn't want to open.
Just made a massive enemy with IsraelRussia want allies
Russia also has buckets of instant sunshine which could appear ready to use in Tehran.Just made a massive enemy with Israel
One of missiles that was used had a manufacturing date of October 1996. I wonder if these things have a shelf life?
I think every Milan I fired was close to end of life - which does make sense, they were expensive and better to use them for training than scrapping them. It was the thermal battery that would die first and we did seem to have quite a few failures and almost always caused by the thermal battery, never saw the gas generator or rocket motor fail.Usually for stuff like this 20-25 years, though some stuff might be a lot less. My dad went to an event once where they were using up MILAN missiles which were coming up on the end of their shelf-life!
Russia want allies
I expect Russia will respond with some attacks on shopping centres, childcare facilities, hospitals etc tonight
That may be what they say they're doing, and even what they want/plan to do, but realistically an Su-34 (modern replacement for the Su-24) cannot adequately fulfil the role of an Su-25. This was the reason they tried (and failed) to develop a modernised Su-25 replacement in the first place, and the reason they're upgrading the ones they have left to the "new" Su-25SM model.They are replacing them with a modified version of the SU-34M, there is a total of 40 on order (not sure what the breakdown of variants is) with between 5 and 10 delivered this year depending on source. Manufacturing isn't currently keeping up with losses.
Non explosive ammunition, be it shells or bullets can generally speaking last indefinitely as long as it's stored correctly, this is why commercially available ammunition doesn't have an expiration date.Russia has been found using artillery shells made in 1947. So clearly the shell life on many types of ammunition is very long!
That may be what they say they're doing, and even what they want/plan to do, but realistically an Su-34 (modern replacement for the Su-24) cannot adequately fulfil the role of an Su-25. This was the reason they tried (and failed) to develop a modernised Su-25 replacement in the first place, and the reason they're upgrading the ones they have left to the "new" Su-25SM model.
This would be like the USAF saying that their F-15E Strike Eagle (modern replacement for the F-111) is going to start replacing the A-10 too, except that if the USAF said it then there would actually be a realistic chance they might find a way to pull it off.
*EDIT*
In fairness, I suppose it is a tad presumptuous of me to mock Russia for upgrading existing airframes and calling them a "new" model of plane, when that's essentially what we're paying Germany to do with "our" Challenger 3 program.
Your delivery is 8 stops away. Click here to track it.Call 0800-BIDEN now for fast, quality ballistic deliveries
At this stage the US should just send the Ukrainians anything they want. Russia has run out of bluffs.
"Russia warns"
Oh no Vlad, we are all trembling!