Ukraine Invasion - Please do not post videos showing attacks/similar

Status
Not open for further replies.
As for Avdiivka, the Russians started off with a really good position, being able to attack from North, East and South. It seems like another Bakhmut where given enough time they can grind their way mm by mm.

Obviously the West's **** poor response has not help, this has been going on for months now and more than enough time for us to react.
 
ubersonic said:
UK: We can only afford to build one aircraft carrier and call it Mumsy, and build two more called Harry and Megan..
Click to expand...

If only we could simply remove the "royal" bit of the naming.. and create an underwater UAV carrier instead for one of them. Really stinks of an admiral wanting a pet pocket aircraft carrier to ingratiate themselves.. after all it's not the royals that are paying for them.. perhaps name it "The Great British Aerial Smackdown".
 
Last edited:
Roar87 said:
Why doesn't Gary just go through the interview point by point and tell us which parts he thinks are lies? Why does he need to speak to Tucker? He can record a video and upload it to Youtube or Twitter.
Click to expand...

It's almost like he's wanting Tucker to speak to someone on both sides of this war rather than a one sided propaganda fest from Putin. But you already know that.
 
Stumble Bum said:
It's almost like he's wanting Tucker to speak to someone on both sides of this war rather than a one sided propaganda fest from Putin. But you already know that.
Click to expand...

Gary Kasparov has called for Putin to be overthrown and he left Russia, so this would hardly be someone on both sides of the war, he's very much pro-Ukraine - we have had non-stop pro-Ukraine media in the West, what would be the point of hearing more of the same? Again, Gary should make some content himself, he's got a big platform and he's a very well known person, he doesn't need Tucker Carlson to put across his views.
 
Last edited:
More of the same?

That's exactly what we got from Putin's revanchist history buffoonery that he's been spouting for over a decade and it's hardly been as hidden as some imply.
 
StriderX said:
More of the same?

That's exactly what we got from Putin's revanchist history buffoonery that he's been spouting for over a decade and it's hardly been as hidden as some imply.
Click to expand...

It was a 2 hour 7 minute interview, the history response was literally the first 10 minutes or so. Did you even watch the interview? And I mean actually watch it
 
Last edited:
Roar87 said:
Gary Kasparov has called for Putin to be overthrown and he left Russia, so this would hardly be someone on both sides of the war, he's very much pro-Ukraine - we have had non-stop pro-Ukraine media in the West, what would be the point of hearing more of the same? Again, Gary should make some content himself, he's got a big platform and he's a very well known person, he doesn't need Tucker Carlson to put across his views.
Click to expand...

Indeed we need to balance it with some evil empire building propaganda telling us it was NATO super gay Nazi hamster super soldiers that inject you with covid vaccines that turn you into lqtbq+ and let the deep state control you aliens oh and 5g masts and that they are liberating the Ukrainian people to heaven..

Edit: Forgot migrants.
 
Last edited:
Roar87 said:
Gary Kasparov has called for Putin to be overthrown and he left Russia, so this would hardly be someone on both sides of the war, he's very much pro-Ukraine - we have had non-stop pro-Ukraine media in the West, what would be the point of hearing more of the same? Again, Gary should make some content himself, he's got a big platform and he's a very well known person, he doesn't need Tucker Carlson to put across his views.
Click to expand...

There’s a very good reason why there has been pro-not-putin. And that would have been the case if Putin didn’t decide he would invade.
 
alchal said:
I really think Russia could 'accidently' hit a NATO base nearby and they would get away with it.
Click to expand...
I think so.. to a point. NATO doesn’t want to get involved because that’ll 100% mean ww3. But if it gets pushed past X limit it’ll all kick off.
 
grudas said:
I think so.. to a point. NATO doesn’t want to get involved because that’ll 100% mean ww3. But if it gets pushed past X limit it’ll all kick off.
Click to expand...

Either way you have to imagine a scenario, where NATO are damned if they do or damned if they dont. If Russia hits a NATO base, and we sit there and do nothing, then that just informs Putin what he probably knows anyway and that he can target the Baltic NATO countries. If Trump gets in the White House again, based on his very recent comments and historical rhetoric on NATO funding that would serve as an indication to Putin that he can push where he wants. In reality, I doubt we get that close to WW3 - I mean sure there's a chance it could happen, but ultimately I guess Putin will have some sense that there is always the unknown if he does attack a NATO country/base.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom