Ukraine Invasion - Please do not post videos showing attacks/similar

Status
Not open for further replies.
Soldato
Joined
3 Oct 2007
Posts
12,133
Location
London, UK
lol Boris wanting $1m to do an interview with Tucker after calling him out, basically doesn't want to be challenged on anything


Zero time for Boris, he is corrupt, a professional liar and everything is about him but then Tucker is also a professional liar. As cj newman said why would a private citizen do an interview with Tucker for free? Boris has at least 10 children to feed doesn't he? And who wants to watch 2 liars lying for 2 hours anyway.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
21 Jan 2010
Posts
23,357
The same Tucker who Putin was critical of for not asking challenging questions? :cry:

Boris has spent his political career dodging actually answering difficult questions when put to him... in fact it has become something of a Tory speciality.
Like labour isn't any different? Lol.
 
Soldato
Joined
1 Dec 2003
Posts
6,476
Location
Kent
An excellent thread from Ed Conway, with some seriously shocking charts.


Here’s the accompanying article:

 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
29 Jul 2010
Posts
23,837
Location
Lincs
An excellent thread from Ed Conway, with some seriously shocking charts.


Here’s the accompanying article:


And we're still (indirectly) buying Russian oil


These issues really need to be put front and centre to every Western politician, its a ******* farce.
 
Caporegime
Joined
29 Dec 2007
Posts
32,004
Location
Adelaide, South Australia
Putin's favourite dog is saying the quiet part out loud.


It doesn't matter if this is true or not; the West should assume it is, and act accordingly.

An excellent thread from Ed Conway, with some seriously shocking charts.


Here’s the accompanying article:


That's why the sanctions are achieving sod all.
 
Last edited:
Associate
Joined
15 Nov 2020
Posts
494
Location
Switzerland
no, in capitalism investors simply want a positive ROI where expected rewards are higher than risks, but risks are acceptable. Otherwise no one would invest in the stock market

No, a rule of law is highly relevant to ensuring assets are kept safe, taxation is fair and regulations on the market are well understood.

Where I custodise my assets if I'm trading a multibillion fund is of huge importance to me, what legal guarantees I have in a counterparty default is incredibly important. Even take an example of a very simple mandate to do indexation trading let alone anything more exotic. ROI is understood as the mandate is strict in terms of tracking so no upside(its actually as severe a breach as going under) for exceeding risk, but you still have to know that I have protection against other events and actions.

Otherwise who would trust anyone in the stock market?
 
Soldato
Joined
6 Feb 2019
Posts
17,958
Looks like the Duma is considering withdrawing and cancelling their part of the German reunification treaty of 1990. By doing that they would withdraw their former loss of claims to Germany, aka Russia wants East Germany back
 
Caporegime
Joined
29 Dec 2007
Posts
32,004
Location
Adelaide, South Australia
Not Biden's finest moment.


I think the people from the land of bicycles and cheese can sit this one out. It's not as if they're any use in a war anyway.

So no sanctions should be in place?

Straw man. I think they should, but they need to be far broader and more damaging. Sanctioning the management of a prison, for crying out loud? What the hell will that achieve?

Hit Russia's energy industry, ban the sale of Russian oil and gas, seize Russian owned assets and sell them to fund Ukraine, nationalise Russian businesses in Western nations, withdraw banking services from Russian oligarchs.

Make it impossible for Russians to do business in the West without losing every ruble they've invested. Make it hurt.
 
Last edited:
Caporegime
Joined
11 Mar 2005
Posts
32,207
Location
Leafy Cheshire
Straw man. I think they should, but they need to be far broader and more damaging. Sanctioning the management of a prison, for crying out loud? What the hell will that achieve?

Hit Russia's energy industry, ban the sale of Russian oil and gas, seize Russian owned assets and sell them to fund Ukraine, nationalise Russian businesses in Western nations, withdraw banking services from Russian oligarchs.

Make it impossible for Russians to do business in the West without losing every ruble they've invested. Make it hurt.

Some sanctions are financial, some are to hurt industry others like the one about the prison are for political reasons.

The west has seized and frozen vast amounts of Russian wealth, banning the sale of Russian oil and gas through a third country is basically impossible, the only real way around it is to stop buying any oil from that country.
 
Caporegime
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
32,623
No, a rule of law is highly relevant to ensuring assets are kept safe, taxation is fair and regulations on the market are well understood.

Where I custodise my assets if I'm trading a multibillion fund is of huge importance to me, what legal guarantees I have in a counterparty default is incredibly important. Even take an example of a very simple mandate to do indexation trading let alone anything more exotic. ROI is understood as the mandate is strict in terms of tracking so no upside(its actually as severe a breach as going under) for exceeding risk, but you still have to know that I have protection against other events and actions.

Otherwise who would trust anyone in the stock market?


Nope, capitalism is present in criminal activities and corporations are more than willing to exploit unfair tax rules. Investments that are secure may have particular value but there is zero requirement for capitalism. Socialism had much tighter requirements on security, law and order
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom