Soldato
Ukraine Invasion - Please do not post videos showing attacks/similar
- Thread starter areksnumbr1sxylady
- Start date
- Status
Russia haven’t stated anything clearly. First Vladolf wasn’t invading, then he was. The mission was first to remove Nazi, then its teaching Russian in schools, then it wasn’t. Next up its NATO expansion, then it’s not NATO, it’s a proxy with the US. Then it’s the UK, Germany, Poland, France.
Putini declared war on Ukrainians for embarking on its campaign of ending Russian influence and the financial and moral corruption that comes with Putin.
Vladolf can’t stand to see a free and prosperous Ukraine, because it exposes the lies and cuts through the Kremlin propaganda.
No, it isn't. Capitalism needs the rule of law. An investor needs to know that their investment - their capital - will not be stolen. They need to know that contracts will be honoured. Otherwise they invest elsewhere.
Soldato
funny because there were no shortage of companies that invested in Russia before the invasion, all the big US companies were there. They just accept a certain amount of corruption, its the price of doing business there.
Caporegime
Yes it is. Capitalism is still operating perfectly well in Russia, despite the kleptocracy.
No. Capitalism works with or without the rule of law (although obviously it works best with the rule of law) but you can still buy and sell things in the midst of anarchy. Just ask Ethiopia.
Exactly. Capitalism is very accommodating, it doesn't care how badly the country is run. It'll still work. Companies learn to live with corruption, factor it into their business model, and reap the benefits it brings them.
Last edited:
Soldato
Hook, line, sinker, rod, and copy of angling times
Thats how far down the accepting Putin speak he is
Commissario
Some parts are naive, some parts don't care.
We still haven't seen the Russian report that was meant to be released years ago in anything other than a massively redacted version after legal action, instead we got a Russian oligarch in the HOL despite the civil service and security services IIRC warning against it.
Last edited:
Soldato
Those 3 Himars strikes on grouped Russia soldiers are crazy. Why are a large groups huddling together like that right out in the open? That drone operator must have been creaming his pants when he heard there were Himars tungsten rain in range.
T
This drove/drives a lot of super computer research to simulate detonations and the national ignition laboratory with all the lasers for fusion is for weapons simulation, not energy
Not any more since the test ban treaty.Do they ever test detonate a nuclear warhead? I don't know much about the subject, probably easier for me to read up but, I assume when they designed trident the warheads were aso designed for the missile or were they from an earlier design... Lots of questions. All a bit macabre a discussion probably
This drove/drives a lot of super computer research to simulate detonations and the national ignition laboratory with all the lasers for fusion is for weapons simulation, not energy
Taurus would be able to be fired at targets inside Russia (unless Germany decide to block that for some reason).
no, in capitalism investors simply want a positive ROI where expected rewards are higher than risks, but risks are acceptable. Otherwise no one would invest in the stock market
Hitting targets inside Russia has never been on the table. Ukraine will have to, and are, creating their own weapons to do that.
Western Intelligence "From all the information we receive we think Putins mission is still to take all of Ukraine"
www.independent.co.uk
Roar - definitely no sign of Western intelligence - 87 "Russia has never wanted to take all of Ukraine, I think that cuz Vlad said so"
Hmm, who to believe...
Putin’s mission remains to fully conquer Ukraine, Western officials say
Western officials have issued a fresh assessment on Vladimir Putin’s goals with Russia holding greater numbers in weaponry and soldiers
www.independent.co.uk
Roar - definitely no sign of Western intelligence - 87 "Russia has never wanted to take all of Ukraine, I think that cuz Vlad said so"
Hmm, who to believe...
The same Tucker who Putin was critical of for not asking challenging questions?
Boris has spent his political career dodging actually answering difficult questions when put to him... in fact it has become something of a Tory speciality.
Why would Boris, who is no longer a public servant, give a free interview to a US journalist?
Just think about that for a while. What does Boris have to gain in the slightest from having an interview with him? If Tucker is serious then he'll pay it.
I mean 1 million is cheap vs the $700m fox spent paying tuckers lawsuits.
Caporegime
I'm less interested in what Boris would say than Putins history lessons.
Last edited:
- Status