This might be what the brochure says but the reality is that the Turanza is a mid-range tyre and the Potenza is the UHP tyre. You wouldn't pick the Turanza over the Potenza if you found yourself in that position.
Not quite sure your point there - I wasn't representing them as anything different or recommending one over the other.
Looks like a completely average tyre, unless you already had 4 of them and only needed to replace 2 tyres I'm not really sure why you'd ever pick it, let alone claim its some sort of adverse weather specialist.
Eh - that review is mostly comparing tyres which
are adverse/wet weather specialist tyres (maybe not super specialised but hence names like RainSport and WetProof). Some of the latest/more expensive do beat it these days but it is still a very good tyre in the wet.
That said I've used some of the tyres in that test including the contis in actual real world conditions and would still pick the Turanzas if I was encountering extremely wet conditions - if for example you are going past a lorry on a slick dual carriageway none of the others, at least that I have experience of, feel quite as assured and they retain a level of control under braking in the rain which that test doesn't represent despite not having quite the stopping distance compared to some of the latest efforts. Hence why the order of the tyres under subjective handling changes a bit compared to the wet braking result, etc.
(Caveat there I've not sat down and compared side by side on the same vehicle).
As a tyre in general they are definitely mid-range as I mentioned the handling overall in the dry is nothing amazing and can even become vague if it is warm and very dry and the comfort is pretty average let down especially by noise.
EDIT: I can't really agree with their conclusion on the Turanzas either - obviously to some extent it is relative to the other tyres they are comparing:
+Good grip in the dry, both handling and braking, good wet handling, low noise, lowest rolling resistance on test.
-Long wet braking, average aquaplaning resistance.
Grip in the dry I'd say was acceptable rather than good though they do handle OK and brake well in the dry as above with good level of control and predictability, definitely good wet handling but definitely not low noise (as other posters in this thread will attest to). The wet braking isn't especially long - I couldn't actually tell a difference without measuring and I've certainly not had any problems with them bringing me to a stop in the rain even with a few 100kgs of weight in the back on a downhill - and in my experience aquaplaning resistance is decent.
I'd hate to use some of the other tyres if the Turanzas are low noise in comparison - unless 2020 or newer produced ones are improved in that respect.
There are much better tyres than the S001. Michelin/Goodyear even Falken.
Yeah I'd agree - though I spent quite awhile looking into Falken before my recent purchase and they seem quite hit and miss - some of their attempts at "halo" tyres in any given segment it seems are pretty good but some of their other efforts are rather dire. For instance the Wildpeak AT3WA I bought are overall good at what they do while the older AT variant are not very good at all.