Using the word 'gay' as a slur

I guess we can't say cracker when referring to thr food as it might be racist.

The word has two meanings, if it's not being used as a slur I don't see how it is an issue?
 
I think the whole point of this thread was gay being used a slur, I don't think any members of this forum use it to point out someone is happy, do you?
 
Once i saw a gay couple on the central line, it was physically sickening. They were wearing full make-up, fishnets, had long hair, were stroking each other and speaking like girls... :(
 
To say something is "so gay" the word gay is pejorative as in it is synonymous with meaning poor/rubbish/crap/sad/lame/bad. Put simply, if your first name was to suddenly become synonymous with those meanings wouldn't you feel a little miffed? Wouldn't you be insulted by the people who used your name flippantly in a derogatory sense.
 
Once i saw a gay couple on the central line, it was physically sickening. They were wearing full make-up, fishnets, had long hair, were stroking each other and speaking like girls... :(

Where as if it was two women you would have cracked one off faster than Gary Glitter at a kids tea party.
 
I think the whole point of this thread was gay being used a slur, I don't think any members of this forum use it to point out someone is happy, do you?

Three meanings then... happy, homosexual and rubbish. If their's no malicious intent there is no reason to be offended.

You don't see because you're a gay. ;):D

...Just because I'm from Brighton, we're not all gayers :mad::p
 
Three meanings then... happy, homosexual and rubbish. If their's no malicious intent there is no reason to be offended.



...Just because I'm from Brighton, we're not all gayers :mad::p

I think if you look up the definition of gay you won't find that it means rubbish. This has come about purely from people who used it a slur in the first place.

I hate PCness as much as anyone else does, but this is hardly the same. People seem to justify their use of what is by definition a slur, by saying it's lost meaning, as if to say, because it doesn't affend them or the one gay friend they happen to have then it's fine. The sheer arrogance of some people amazes me, the majority of people in this thread want us to go by their own made up definition of a word and completely ignore the one in the dictionary, odd.
 
Last edited:
Not entirely the point though is it? By your logic any form of discriminatory comment is fine aslong as the target of said comment doesn't complain.

and we have a winner!!!

of course, as long as no one actually takes offense to it then its not offensive.

its probably more offensive you telling people what they should and should not find offensive.
 
I don't recall the same fuss being made over the word "queer" which originally started out as meaning 'strange'. The teens of today will find another word to adopt as derogatory by the end of the decade, I'm sure.
 
Should have shot them both..
with your jizz in their eyes!

Whether that is a joke or not, I am astounded you have written that.

It sums up how unseriously homophobia is taken compared to, say, racism. You would have never made a similar joke regarding race.
 
Whether that is a joke or not, I am astounded you have written that.

It sums up how unseriously homophobia is taken compared to, say, racism. You would have never made a similar joke regarding race.

Sounds like a challenge to me.
 
and we have a winner!!!

of course, as long as no one actually takes offense to it then its not offensive.

its probably more offensive you telling people what they should and should not find offensive.

That's not what I said, winrar. You can be offended by something and not tell somebody about it, i'm pretty sure that's a possibility.
 
Back
Top Bottom