He was a great character, so technically you could be correct, but the show still has plenty of appeal. If appeal was previously 88 out of 100, maybe now it's 84...
I'm not good at history, the show is based on real events though, right? I guess it had to happen in the show?
Vikings will never be the same nor have the same appeal ever again. You guys don't agree, after The one who must not be named's death?
Oh man I thought it was going to be an epic war coming but then it skipped to Ecberts demise was gutted.
Still a good episode though and great season so far
There is just something about the guy that plays Floki that just makes him appear so menacing, like he was born to play this role.
The look in his eyes when he was pacing out ahead of the army, that is one guy I would not want to be on the bad side of.
Yes I thought that scene was awesome. A bit disappointed they didn't bother showing any of the battle though.
As for King Ecbert, he may not be dead yet but I don't think he should start any long books.
King Ecberts fine, king Aelle, not so much