"So, Mr Pomeroy, you are before this court today so I can ascertain what motives you had to stop and interrogate this child, asking for his name and address? And by the way I am pleased to read you are making a slow recovery from the beating the child's father bestowed upon you, you don't need to try and rise from your wheelchair for the court"
"Well, I had been observing him running past my window for a few weeks and he seemed unhappy, so I asked for advice on a computer forum and a Special Constable said I should"
"What is this Constable's name"
"He goes by the pseudonym of Burnsey your honour, so I don't know"
I believe "Burnsey" may be well meant, but I also see much naivety in his advice, too.
I mean,, in 2020 what possible slanderous mutterings could such a case cause amongst neighbours, friends and associates? 40 years ago, fine, now, well, I''d not be risking potential misinterpretations over questioning a child on the evidence stated.