**WANT 8GB 2400MHz FOR AS LITTLE AS £59.99 Inc. VAT? - THEN CHECK THIS THREAD OUT!!** (MV-3V4G3D/US)

After 8 Packs timings i got down to 34.6ns nut still couldn't get 2400Mhz stable. I pushed the voltage up to 1.6 but still no joy.

Thanks for the timings 8 pack :)
 
After 8 Packs timings i got down to 34.6ns nut still couldn't get 2400Mhz stable. I pushed the voltage up to 1.6 but still no joy.

Thanks for the timings 8 pack :)

Try Latency boundary 10 now!! test stability, then 9 and so on. I used 11 at 2400mhz so at 2133 or 2200 it should be able to come down. Around 9 is about right for perf stability trade off with these DIMMS at your speeds.

Latency Boundary on this board sets the Third set of timings for you to those that work efficiently together. The lower the number the better the performance. Once you have the lowest number that is stable at the speed you want then look at what its setting and work change one third timing at a time moving down a clock and testing again.
 
Last edited:
Will secondary and third timings help with the overall latency?

Be careful mate you cant compare memory results on Z77 to X79. X79 has inherently longer latency and less impressive benchmarking scores. Subs can be much tighter on Z77. SB-E IMC is inherantly inefficient.
 
Be careful mate you cant compare memory results on Z77 to X79. X79 has inherently longer latency and less impressive benchmarking scores. Subs can be much tighter on Z77. SB-E IMC is inherantly inefficient.

That's what i was thinking.
That said, what does quad channel give over dual? I would assume more bandwidth.
 
That's what i was thinking.
That said, what does quad channel give over dual? I would assume more bandwidth.

Sadly not when compared to Dual Channel IMC on Ivy.

Role on Ivy -E!!!! That will kick ass as no onboard GPU taking up all the surface area for cooling and quad channel IVY IMC!!!;)
 
Sadly not when compared to Dual Channel IMC on Ivy.

Role on Ivy -E!!!! That will kick ass as no onboard GPU taking up all the surface area for cooling and quad channel IVY IMC!!!;)

I'm jumping on Ivy Bridge-E ASAP so yes, cannot wait :)

What timings do you think will be possible @ 2333MHz @ 1.6v with this Sabertooth and 3930K?
 
Last edited:
Try Latency boundary 10 now!! test stability, then 9 and so on. I used 11 at 2400mhz so at 2133 or 2200 it should be able to come down. Around 9 is about right for perf stability trade off with these DIMMS at your speeds.

Latency Boundary on this board sets the Third set of timings for you to those that work efficiently together. The lower the number the better the performance. Once you have the lowest number that is stable at the speed you want then look at what its setting and work change one third timing at a time moving down a clock and testing again.

Thanks for that, I will give it a go tonight when I get in from work. So badly want 2400Mhz out of this awesome RAM
 
I'm jumping on Ivy Bridge-E ASAP so yes, cannot wait :)

What timings do you think will be possible @ 2333MHz @ 1.6v with this Sabertooth and 3930K?

Rephrase that question mate. Not sure exactly what your getting at??? If you mean sandy E and Saber its only possible to speculate really but better than Ivy 1155 which Cas 9 2400 works well. Remember higher than 2600 options will be available with Ivy E so you will want to sure for mhz then timings.
 
Rephrase that question mate. Not sure exactly what your getting at??? If you mean sandy E and Saber its only possible to speculate really but better than Ivy 1155 which Cas 9 2400 works well. Remember higher than 2600 options will be available with Ivy E so you will want to sure for mhz then timings.

Sorry, let me try again lol :p

I have the x79 Sabertooth board, so obviously don't quite have the memory tweaking options that you do with the RIVE. That said, what do think i should expect to achieve in regards to memory timings if i were to change the memory multiplier to get 2333MHz instead of my current 2000MHz?
I was thinking around 10,11,11,28,1T.

In addition to this, in your opinion, is it worth me trying?
 
Thanks for that, I will give it a go tonight when I get in from work. So badly want 2400Mhz out of this awesome RAM

2400 was fairly easy to be honest but my 3570 has strong controller, very strong infact. My 3770 is a joke!!! Its outta here as soon as I have done a couple more benches with it.
 
Sorry, let me try again lol :p

I have the x79 Sabertooth board, so obviously don't quite have the memory tweaking options that you do with the RIVE. That said, what do think i should expect to achieve in regards to memory timings if i were to change the memory multiplier to get 2333MHz instead of my current 2000MHz?
I was thinking around 10,11,11,28,1T.

In addition to this, in your opinion, is it worth me trying?

Worth trying hell yes!!!!!

I have not even tried the Samsung on my RIVE to be honest. Primary timings start with 10-12-12-31 2T and Tune.
 
Thanks for that, I will give it a go tonight when I get in from work. So badly want 2400Mhz out of this awesome RAM

Hey 8 Pack, i tried your suggestions but didnt work sadly.

9-11-11-21-1T Latency Boundry 11 @2400Mhz 1.6V = Wouldn't boot
9-11-11-21-1T Latency Boundry 11 @2400Mhz 1.65V = Wouldn't boot
9-10-10-21-2T Latency Boundry 11 @2400Mhz 1.65V = Wouldn't boot

Any other suggestions? As mentioned in one of my earlier posts im pretty new to RAM OC'ing

Appreciate any feedback you may have.

Thanks
 
Hmm Start at LB 14 then and work down. Maybe 12 will!!!! What debug code you at 55???? This means memory controller can make the frequency but memory needs tuning.
 
I dont get any debug code?! I just try and boot into W7. I tried the LB14 setting and nowt. I think I will stick to 2200Mhz for now until I can find out some further info on this

Thanks for your help 8 Pack :)
 
I just went with these instead

Kingston HyperX Genesis Grey 8GB (2x4GB) DDR3 PC3-12800C9 1600MHz Dual Channel Kit (KHX1600C9D3X2K2/8GX) [KHX1600C9D3X2K2/8GX]

Did I make a bad choice? As long as they are stable at 4ghz on an i5 760 sandy setup then im happy
 
Back
Top Bottom