Tbh, and this is coming from some1 who doesnt know the laws of refridgerators....but if some1 is operating outside of the law, as stated by philstanbridge, then surely it should be the duty of the members of this forum to alert other members of their dealings. At the end of the day, we are all enthusiasts who browse this forum, and surely we all expect the best performance from the best parts, and dont want to be flogged off by some1 who has knocked together something illegally. So therefore, if any1 has bought a phase cooling unit, that has failed, and either the warranty has been void, or money has not been given back for whatever reason, then surely the provider of the phase unit in question should be named so that others who may be interested in buying a phase unit know to stay well clear of this person. As far as I realize, the workings with fridge units can be hazardous, and ofc, no1 here wants their phase unit leaking all over their floor etc etc etc.
I know that we arent allowed to list other sellers or providers of products on this forum, but are we allowed to name and shame traders who illegally provide sub-standard products outside of the law? And considering they would be trading outside of the law, then their business practice wont really matter? Its just an idea, maybe a mod can comment on this?
The current legality relates to the handling of any ozone depleting substance.
Whilst refrigerants such as r402a (due to 38% r22 content) are ozone depleting - many others like r134a, r290, r404a, r507 aren't.
From April this year (now) it's manditory for refrigeration suppliers to check that an engineer has at least C+G 2078 certification before they can be sold refrigerant.
Currently it is legal for a non certified engineer to posses and charge a system with any refrigerant not outlawed by the Montreal protocol, but as of July this too will become illegal. Will it be inforced, especially in this community? Unlikely...
A big point - A Prometia/Vapo builder being "qualified" to work with refrigerants means nothing to the quality of the end product. To get the basic C+G certification costs ~£250 and is exceptionally easy.
Assuming this builder doesn't have certification (which he might well have) then it would be very easy for him to get it. Would it change anything if he did?
Of course not, his products would be exactly the same. The only people in this area who need to worry about "legality" are people like Phil who are operating a company and therefore responsible for what they provide.
This is a tight community, reputation means a lot to the buyers. Sooner or later the bad reputation will build up and the bad builders dissappear. Where's your warranty now...?
Phil said it best - "You get what you pay for"
Last edited:

!!!
