I can understand people being a bit peeved, but the idea the game might be replayed is pretty laughable. Tbh I think most of the 'uproar' is because Ireland were the underdogs, if it was the other way round and Ireland scored a goal from a dubious handball to put France out I imagine people would be ROFLing instead of crying out for a replay.
I watch American football now and then, I simply don't see ANY cheating that isn't dealt with immediately, but realistically theres next to no real cheating anyway nothing, video replay is almost exclusive used for incidents where they simply couldn't see things in real time, introduce video replays, all cheating is caught and within weeks people would stop cheating.
Just saw this too - wait while I gather my breath a minute...it happens *ALL* the time, they play right on the edge, late hits, pass interference, early starts, blocking, grabbing jerseys, you name it, it happens - sometimes they get away with it, sometimes they don't - watch more than 'now and again' and even *with* video replays there is still tons of analysis on whether the ref made the right call, whether a player 'cheated' to get an unfair advantage. The idea that video replays stop cheating is laughable
Pick another sport which uses video replay - cricket. Do players always walk when they feel an edge? Claim bump-ball catches? Tampering with the ball? None of that seems to have been prevented by video replays, nor do the umpires always get it 'right' even with video replays again.
How about rugby? Citing commissions have existed for a while now, yet players still play on the edge, illegal rucking, dangerous tackles, will claim trys when they know they went into touch, hell look at Bloodgate recently...