** Weekend Football Thread ** *spoilers*
- Thread starter Tummy
- Start date
As long as he got the ball then it's not a foul
Thats the argument we are having, where have you been all evening?
Webb didnt see the ball deviate, therefore he couldnt tell if Gomez got a touch, thats why he has given the pen.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 1 Mar 2008
- Posts
- 26,303
I didn't say anything about a possible sending off for it.
It's simple.
GK gets no touch of ball but brings player down = Pen
GK brings player down first but touches ball after making contact = Pen
GK touches ball first then player goes down = No Pen
*note to 'Arry R*
Bigger Headstart Required.
Bigger Headstart Required.
If this is on betfair, they always give decimal odds by default. Hover the mouse over the decimal odds to get the fractional odds.
For example on betfair currently the odds for Man Utd to win the premiership is 1.13 or 0.13/1 (they round to 2/15). For Liverpool 9.0 or 8/1.
Last edited:
I didn't say anything about a possible sending off for it.
It's simple.
GK gets no touch of ball but brings player down = Pen
GK brings player down first but touches ball after making contact = Pen
GK touches ball first then player goes down = No Pen
I know that, I am giving the reasoning behind the Refs decision, I understand the rules and workings of the game more than you evidently or we wouldnt be having this argument, he clearly hasnt seen the keeper get the ball, so he has given the pen.
Thank you, good night, and give my regards to that AC Milan supporting half wit in my ignore list.
Where have i debated that? Just because Webb didn't see it, it doesn't mean it was the right decision. All i said was that it wasn't a pen and was responding to somebody who said it was a clear pen.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 1 Mar 2008
- Posts
- 26,303
I wasn't arguing though.
I said twice that the ref was right to give it if he didn't see the touch but you quoted me twice trying to explain how it was a definite penalty.
Naa i did it on ladbrokes and the odds were 5.00 so I've sent them an e-mail.
Where have i debated that? Just because Webb didn't see it, it doesn't mean it was the right decision. All i said was that it wasn't a pen and was responding to somebody who said it was a clear pen.
I didnt say you were dude, you seemed to be bewildered as to why it was contentious
Thats 4/1 then. Unless they wrote 5/1, 5.00 will be decimal odds.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 1 Mar 2008
- Posts
- 26,303
5.00 = 4/1
Soldato
If the odds were 5.00 then that's 4/1, not 5/1. Some sites use decimals.
At 2-0 down Man Utd were 4/1 on Ladbrokes and a fair few other sites.
DUHHH I really should refresh the page when I've been gone for 45 minutes.
We've had a damn game in hand hanging over us for months. I wish we could just put Liverpool out of their misery already.
It's a pretty sad state of affairs if people think poor refereeing decisions outside Old Trafford is either an honest mistake/bad judgement/human error yet inside Old Trafford it means the referees are corrupt.
It's a pretty sad state of affairs if people think poor refereeing decisions outside Old Trafford is either an honest mistake/bad judgement/human error yet inside Old Trafford it means the referees are corrupt.
Soldato
