Caporegime
What if the 3000 series is over hyped?
I think it definitely was.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
What if the 3000 series is over hyped?
If they do not sell out that is. If they do I may even end up with a 3070 as I originally said I would. I am not paying more than £649.No worries you will still buy it for hdmi 2.1
I agree. Was not as good as it was hyped, but good enough for me to upgrade if I find any in stock.I think it definitely was.
What are you disappointed with?I think it definitely was.
What are you disappointed with?
Depends on games people are playing and resolution is my take on it after a quick flick through a few reviews (so not a conclusion). 4K & modern games especially with RT and looks decent. Example Wolfenstein YB 30% uplift in performance vs the £1100+ previous Ti for the price of a 2080 Super. In fact, faster than a Titan RTX too here.
Of course there was a bit more hype so the figures quoted are the best you'll see in particular titles but that's tech .
I was expecting slightly better rasterisation performance, but the main one is I was expecting MUCH better RT performance. Hence I agree it was over hyped in Jensen's presentation. That said hyping works for Nvidia and can even boost sales, for AMD the opposite happensWhat are you disappointed with?
Depends on games people are playing and resolution is my take on it after a quick flick through a few reviews (so not a conclusion). 4K & modern games especially with RT and looks decent. Example Wolfenstein YB 30% uplift in performance vs the £1100+ previous Ti for the price of a 2080 Super. In fact, faster than a Titan RTX too here.
Of course there was a bit more hype so the figures quoted are the best you'll see in particular titles but that's tech .
I'm just a bit disappointed only 3080 reviews today given the first of the new GPU's is about to be released.
Of course you'd think thatI think it definitely was.
I was expecting slightly better rasterisation performance, but the main one is I was expecting MUCH better RT performance. Hence I agree it was over hyped in Jensen's presentation. That said hyping works for Nvidia and can even boost sales, for AMD the opposite happens
It's the only thing that survived the wreck.I think the star of the reviews was the cooler on the FE,
I was expecting them to not only improve the efficiency of each RT core, but to double the number of them. Hence my disappointment and it shows in the results so far. That said it is definitely an improvement over Turding and the gap will only widen in future games.Will have a closer read shortly. Not sure about RT. Is that because current games only implement it lightly? So, gets diluted with rasterization performance and NV expecting move towards RT more ? Just thinking here, I don't know enough about how it's applied. At 4K Quake 2 is 94% faster than the previous 2080 (non-super) and here it's all about how well RT can be done.
IndeedHype works better for some companies than others
I think it definitely was.
It's about as fast as I expected 30% over a 2080 Ti but for a lot less money. I am impressed with the performance of the new reference cooler, keeping a 320 watt card under control without running the fans super hard is no mean feat. AMD, take note!
Good thing Nvidia don't show you the junction temps.
It's about as fast as I expected 30% over a 2080 Ti but for a lot less money. I am impressed with the performance of the new reference cooler, keeping a 320 watt card under control without running the fans super hard is no mean feat. AMD, take note!