What watch do you wear?

Of course it devalues the Omega brand, if expensive brands could improve their image by selling their copyright to cheap brands, and it be a good idea, they would all be doing it, they don't, because it's a basic business mistake. Brand protection is sacrosanct for high end watches and fashion surely??

I'm sure Ferrari badged Ford fiestas would sell well, for Ford, but it'd devalue the brand.

There was once an Aston branded Toyota iQ… It sold really badly. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.au...st-city-car-the-aston-martin-cygnet-story?amp
 
This is good Vlog of the events which unravelled on Saturday morning at Swatch shops in London. Turns out there were just 570 MoonSwatches available for sale in the whole of the country (London and Edinburgh)

 
This is good Vlog of the events which unravelled on Saturday morning at Swatch shops in London. Turns out there were just 570 MoonSwatches available for sale in the whole of the country (London and Edinburgh)
If that is true, across all the model variants, then lol.

Must have been desperate to get them out the door to throw shade on whatever Rolex announced.
 
Impossible, can't be a submariner if it can't be submerged :p

At least the Moonswatch is 30m vs the Speedy's 50m.
 
It looked a whole better experience in Geneva - no gangs pushing to the front and killing it for everyone else, like in London.

 
Where did I say anything about devaluing the brand, and what even is devaluing in this instance? We all know the Swatch recreation isn't a Speedmaster. Those that want a Speedmaster will continue to buy one.

If the Swatch release enables more people to get into watches or to be able to fill a hole in their collection on a budget.. I'm all for it. The level of snobbery is literally insane and I find it embrassing.

Devaluing the brand would be by moving the speedmaster from its higher end status to main market with a plastic swatch version. Clearly there is huge demand for this version, it would be exactly the same if Rolex released a plastic Daytona, that's not going to happen as they don't want to devalue the brand and be a mass market product.

Not sure how my views on marketing strategy and business are viewed as 'snobbery'?! Very odd.
 
Devaluing the brand would be by moving the speedmaster from its higher end status to main market with a plastic swatch version. Clearly there is huge demand for this version, it would be exactly the same if Rolex released a plastic Daytona, that's not going to happen as they don't want to devalue the brand and be a mass market product.

Not sure how my views on marketing strategy and business are viewed as 'snobbery'?! Very odd.
Paraphrasing but I think the insinuation is you are saying the OG Speedy is worth less now because poor folk can buy something similar (design wise).

I don't think anyone buying a Speedy is concerned about a plastic collab with the parent company - if anything, folk now know what a Speedy is - and demand will go up for the 'proper thing'.
 
Paraphrasing but I think the insinuation is you are saying the OG Speedy is worth less now because poor folk can buy something similar (design wise).

I don't think anyone buying a Speedy is concerned about a plastic collab with the parent company - if anything, folk now know what a Speedy is - and demand will go up for the 'proper thing'.

It's just a view on branding and the perception that people have of brands and there views on their value/worth. That's clearly brand snobbery to some extent, not me being a snob though:D

Either way I think it'll be a positive for swatch, a negative for omega. I also think it'll be positive overall for the Swatch Group. However, I think overall it'll push omega further away from brands like Rolex.
 
Whole thing seems a bit of a soulless cash grab on swatches part to be honest :(

I remember when I first heard about plastic Swatch speedmasters, I thought it was a joke...
 
Back
Top Bottom