I'M NOT YOUR BUDDY, GUY!
Anyways of course it's my opinion. Who else's is it likely to be? Or do you frequently post other people's opinions on internet forums?
it was a stupid post and inaccurate and your sly dig at the other guy after it wasnt too nice either
I respect your opinion, and am saddened that you cannot pay me the same honour. However I still believe that the TH Carrera is a poor version of the Speedmaster. Nothing sly about it, it's simply my view.
explain how you come to this conclusion? the dial layout is different, the sub dials are designed differently.
Is the rolex daytona a copy aswell?
Why is the tag a 'poor' version?
Is every chrono with a tachymetre a copy of the speedmaster?
Swatch, didn't cost much but it does the job.
explain how you come to this conclusion? the dial layout is different, the sub dials are designed differently.
Is the rolex daytona a copy aswell?
Why is the tag a 'poor' version?
Is every chrono with a tachymetre a copy of the speedmaster?
If you can't see the similarities between the Speedmaster and the Carrera then I'm afraid you have wool over your eyes. Of course they have to introduce some differences otherwise it's just a blatant copy. This is a more subtle copy.
The Speedmaster
- has a greater heritage
- was here first
- has a better movement and is arguably better made
- is a more classic / classy / better-looking watch
...and for your benefit, IMO .
Don't get so defensive though, it's only a watch, and the fact that you prefer it is all that matters.