When are you going fully electric?

Jonnycoupe said:
Audi-A6-e-tron-leaked-front-3-4_edq6uj.jpg
See the AUDI A6 has popped up today, Sportback and Avant flavour on PPE. Has the same fat metal waist most BEVs trying to be saloons have, ie i4 etc. Nose very Korean looking in my view and also a RWD Audi on the A6 rather than S6.

Almost looks like a Posh OG Ioniq.


www.autocar.co.uk

Radical electric Audi A6 brings 463-mile range for £69,900 | Autocar

Striking estate and saloon get Q6 e-tron tech, 800V architecture and 543bhp range-topper
www.autocar.co.uk www.autocar.co.uk
Click to expand...
looks nice enough imo, however not a huge fan of the front grille. If i needed a new large car I would consider one once its 3 years old or so and in my price bracket .... (once the inevitable 1st owner company car person gets rid of it)

nothing really stands out about it however looks wise imo, but then i generally feel that about most Audis
 
Last edited:
chanjy said:
A6 Avant - 502l boot

Massive car with dedicated EV underpinnings but still results in an A4/3 series sized boot, why?
Click to expand...

502l is bigger than both A3 and A4. But I tend to think these litre values are often misleading, my ID3 has a smaller boot (385l) than the Skoda Kamiq (400l) that it replaced but it's got a much more usable and useful boot because what it most loses is the space under the removal floor. Getting luggage, shopping, crates of beers, etc. into the ID3 is easier. I suspect it's a similar thing here, the batteries extend under the boot meaning that it can be as tall, but is probably just as wide and deep if not more.
 
Mr Jack said:
502l is bigger than both A3 and A4. But I tend to think these litre values are often misleading, my ID3 has a smaller boot (385l) than the Skoda Kamiq (400l) that it replaced but it's got a much more usable and useful boot because what it most loses is the space under the removal floor. Getting luggage, shopping, crates of beers, etc. into the ID3 is easier. I suspect it's a similar thing here, the batteries extend under the boot meaning that it can be as tall, but is probably just as wide and deep if not more.
Click to expand...
A 3 series touring is 500l, so definitely comparable. Just disappointing as for a family car I don't think the A6 avant is going to be a very good option

I think the litre volume does account for height under the cover but doesn't give you a good picture of whether shape is usefully square or not
 
chanjy said:
A 3 series touring is 500l, so definitely comparable. Just disappointing as for a family car I don't think the A6 avant is going to be a very good option

I think the litre volume does account for height under the cover but doesn't give you a good picture of whether shape is usefully square or not
Click to expand...
Image 17 of the Sportback here tells me that its a very usable 500L - https://www.carmagazine.co.uk/car-news/first-official-pictures/audi/a6-e-tron/

Looks at least as usable as my Leon which has an extra 80 odd litres on paper.
 
Last edited:
chanjy said:
Yes but 'at least as usable' as your Leon which is 4.6m long isn't a great endorsement. What are Audi doing with the extra foot in length (plus half a foot in width?) :D
Click to expand...
The point I was trying to make is that the 502L capacity doesn't necessarily tell you the whole story.

Boot space looks quite disappointing at first – both the Sportback and Avant offer 502 litres. That’s 18 litres less than you get in the BMW 5 Series and only 77 litres more than you get in the Tesla Model 3 which, let’s not forget, belongs to the class below.

However, Audi only measures the A6’s boot capacity up to the level of the parcel shelf – and we can confirm there’s more space in both cars than that figure would lead you to believe.
Click to expand...
Also to keep with my fairly pointless comparison to my c-segment estate... The A6 e tron probably allows for the rear passengers having actual usable length legs. Something my Leon doesn't :p
 
Last edited:
chanjy said:
What are Audi doing with the extra foot in length (plus half a foot in width?) :D
Click to expand...
definitely going to need a bigger garage, Rayners planning for that, maybe europe has space though.

more is less - they're raving about the class leading cd (even if they don't disclose the drag) the tear-drop shape gets improved by a foot at the back; CLA tourer has a nice shape/cd too, but impractical versus 3er.

modern cosmetics of having bigger wheels too, needing bigger arches and overhangs, despite ev gubbins taking up less space under the bonnet.
 
jpaul said:
definitely going to need a bigger garage, Rayners planning for that, maybe europe has space though.

more is less - they're raving about the class leading cd (even if they don't disclose the drag) the tear-drop shape gets improved by a foot at the back; CLA tourer has a nice shape/cd too, but impractical versus 3er.

modern cosmetics of having bigger wheels too, needing bigger arches and overhangs, despite ev gubbins taking up less space under the bonnet.
Click to expand...
Cd is 0.21 according to carwow.
I think:D
 
shephga said:
Have started taking an interest in used low mileage electric cars such as the Leaf, Ioniq or E-Niro. 2023 Leaf with very low miles for ~ £13k…
Click to expand...

Main problem with the leaf is the chademo charging - it's basically obsolete (in the UK at least), which means finding a compatible rapid charger is going to get more difficult as time goes on.

Not a problem if you never need to public charge, but may impact future value (as you're already seeing from the low price!)
 
Last edited:
You can get a chademo to CCS adapter now, expensive but it’s there if you want it.

PS. I’d want to be spending less than 13k for a 2023 leaf given you can get a brand new 2024 pre-reg for £16k.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom