• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

When the Gpu's prices will go down ?

Do we have any info on TSMC's 5nm and 4nm wafer prices?
I know demand is lower now, but while we all decry the huge mark-ups all around, the capital investment required to be TSMC are country national budget level so they can't go that low.
The end of Moore's law has long been predicted to be not technical but rather that eventually new nodes get too expensive.

A bit early but if we had the wafer prices, yields and die sizes we could get an idea of the min price they could be sold for, or at least compare them to this gen.
 
Do we have any info on TSMC's 5nm and 4nm wafer prices?
I know demand is lower now, but while we all decry the huge mark-ups all around, the capital investment required to be TSMC are country national budget level so they can't go that low.
The end of Moore's law has long been predicted to be not technical but rather that eventually new nodes get too expensive.

A bit early but if we had the wafer prices, yields and die sizes we could get an idea of the min price they could be sold for, or at least compare them to this gen.
I think it is impossible to get exact figures or even ball park figures as these will be trade secrets and will differ from company to company.
 
Do we have any info on TSMC's 5nm and 4nm wafer prices?
Like Chuk_Chuk says you'll never get an exact figure but some analysts estimated it around $17k but on it's own that's pretty meaningless as (afaik) we don't know how many working dies they'd get from one 300mm wafer, the same analysts estimated a cost of $238 per chip but that could be way off or pretty close. :)
 
Well from before volume, this article had an estimate of under 0.1 per cm² (yes that's a non-SI unit!).
And that's also the default on this calculator:
Gives us these figures:
y9IxaJQ.png

Yields for volume manufacturer should be better than that but packaging etc. also cost. More complex packaging like the 3D stacking will costs a fair but.
 
From current gen I'd buy a 6700xt for <500€ or a 6700 non xt nof <450€, everything else is either too expensive or going to be obsolete too soon for my tastes.

Obsolete too soon ? My 3060ti beats 6900xt in Ezbenchmark (EU5 benchmark) by 15% according to the benchmarks on this forum.. if that's any type of indication..
 
Do we have any info on TSMC's 5nm and 4nm wafer prices?

The prices are based on quantity bought. Nvidia is able to buy 5x as many wafers as AMD because Nvidias market share is 5x as big. So Nvidia will get a really good deal with TSMC and sell them for a really high price. AMD will pay much more per wafer and they'll be expected to sell them cheap because of their supposed inferior driver reputation etc.
 
The prices are based on quantity bought. Nvidia is able to buy 5x as many wafers as AMD because Nvidias market share is 5x as big. So Nvidia will get a really good deal with TSMC and sell them for a really high price. AMD will pay much more per wafer and they'll be expected to sell them cheap because of their supposed inferior driver reputation etc.
Er? Is there a (sarc) missing?
Nvidia only make GPUs.
AMD make CPUs as well, and on 7nm they were one of TSMC's biggest customer while Nvidia only had their non consumer parts on TSMC and used the far cheaper Samsung for the gaming cards.
Not the kind of behaviour that's likely to have gotten them preferential treatment for their return to TSMC.
Plus, AMD also had all the consoles on TSMC 7nm too.
 
While they maybe paying a load of money they're not in the top three customers, that's Intel, Apple, and AMD in third. Reduced demand effects AMD far less as they can dynamically change up their allocation between GPU's and three different CPU market segments (Servers, HEDT, and consumer).
 
3090/3090ti price crash! Even ocuk's site has shown quite a shift in price unless it was like that before?

They are still far too expensive. We all know there is a high probability that these cards performance will be mid tear next gen. So what do you get for all the extra money you pay, some extra useless vram that will hardly ever be used?

The 4070 will probably (hopefully) have better RT performance also and cost less than half the price. Also it is well known that Nvidia mainly optimise for whatever their current gen is when new games come out. Plus let's be honest, we all like the latest shiny cards :)
 
Obsolete too soon ? My 3060ti beats 6900xt in Ezbenchmark (EU5 benchmark) by 15% according to the benchmarks on this forum.. if that's any type of indication..

I checked the 3060ti and it's roughly the same price as the 6700xt in Italy.
I must admit it's pretty competitive as value proposition (better RT VS more RAM) but in my experience I estimate the AMD card is going to degrade in performance more gracefully than the NVIDIA one.
 
Verified source of your information rather than heresay? Thanks.
Apologises as i think i mixed up current largest customers (5nm) with predicted future customers (3nm), it was late. (Source)
The report also alleges that Intel will go all-in with TSMC’s 3nm process node. Team Blue will supposedly tap into the node to manufacture its GPUs as well as certain CPUs in 2023. So much so that the chipmaker is expected to become TSMC’s second-largest client, next to only Apple, pushing AMD to the third position in the foundry’s book.
 
Verified source of your information rather than heresay? Thanks.
Well, @CuriousTomCat's claim was the bit which needed verified sources (or rather taking GPU marketshare and ignoring all CPUs especially since gaming Ampere is made by Samsung was not correct)!

These things are obviously "trade secrets", and a lot of time leaked or guessed via paid "analyst reports.
However, this Semi Wiki forum post had a 2019-2021 chart:
3VOILde.png

I'm actually surprised that after Ampere Nvidia's share was still so high. GA100 (the 54 billion transistor, 800+mm² monster made on TSMC's 7nm) was their only TMSC 7nm part. Guess they also still had some TSMC 14nm parts.
So that forum post table is leaked from some paywall thing.
Statista has different figures:
QKbjJvp.png

Considering the sheer volume of consoles, 5% seems low for AMD unless the revenue is booked separately as I'm unsure what Sony's 2.5% includes, but Microsoft isn't in that list.
And then there
(this story was also report by TechPowerUp):
"Last year, TSMC’s second-largest customer contributed NT$153.74 billion to its sales, accounting for 10 percent of the chipmaker’s total, company data showed.
Analysts said they suspect the customer was Advanced Micro Devices Inc (AMD).
TSMC’s data indicated it was the first time sales from its second-largest customer rose to 10 percent of its total sales. "
 
Back
Top Bottom