Another 10 years does seem a bit ridiculous, especially looking at how far progressed a lot of the work is already, like the various viaducts and tunnels that have already been built... French lines of similar scale seem to take about 5 years to build, but this delay takes it to about 15 years.
Poor decision making at the government level has got to be part of the story (constant changes to scope, lack of certainty about the project meaning no one can invest in capacity to deliver it with confidence, deliberately slowing delivery to reduce annual costs even if the total cost increases as a result, etc), but I think it's clear HS2 itself and the contractors working for them share the blame.
I'm very pro high speed rail in general, but the way HS2 is being managed by our politicians and delivered by the industry is making it hard to stay enthusiastic.
Would echo comments about how things like this seem all too emblematic of wider problems with the direction the country is going and how it's being run.
Poor decision making at the government level has got to be part of the story (constant changes to scope, lack of certainty about the project meaning no one can invest in capacity to deliver it with confidence, deliberately slowing delivery to reduce annual costs even if the total cost increases as a result, etc), but I think it's clear HS2 itself and the contractors working for them share the blame.
I'm very pro high speed rail in general, but the way HS2 is being managed by our politicians and delivered by the industry is making it hard to stay enthusiastic.
Would echo comments about how things like this seem all too emblematic of wider problems with the direction the country is going and how it's being run.
Last edited: