I think the best example of government mismanagement on HS2 might be Euston. It's been redesigned about 3 times now, had construction start and stop, funding apparently confirmed and then not confirmed... all the while HS2 obviously needs a high capacity station at Euston but the government kept considering cutting it back to Old Oak Common... just need a clear decision that government will stick to.
The latest decision is to go with a 6 HS2 platform design, but this will clearly be a massive limitation on future service levels and the kind of short termism that national infrastructure projects should avoid. Still not actually clear how/whether the station itself will be funded either.
The engineering challenges aren't really that significant compared to the challenges of getting infrastructure built around the various environmental and planning obstacles requiring reams and reams of expensive paperwork that are in reality mostly worthless, and the challenges of a government that keeps introducing uncertainty and preventing long term investment in the sector.
The latest decision is to go with a 6 HS2 platform design, but this will clearly be a massive limitation on future service levels and the kind of short termism that national infrastructure projects should avoid. Still not actually clear how/whether the station itself will be funded either.
The engineering challenges aren't really that significant compared to the challenges of getting infrastructure built around the various environmental and planning obstacles requiring reams and reams of expensive paperwork that are in reality mostly worthless, and the challenges of a government that keeps introducing uncertainty and preventing long term investment in the sector.
Last edited: