Just another baseless claim from a Scottish indy supporter.Interesting, had heard hs2 spending was being reimbursed as England-only spending via Barnett formula. Got a source showing how it's treated by Barnett formula, and has this changed recently?
Seems clear there will be some benefit to Scotland though, as rail journeys to/from Birmingham & London will be faster, so not sure Why it would only be seen as a 'potential' benefit.
HS2 will not cost Scotland £17 billion - Full Fact
In effect, all money spent by Scotland on HS2 is returned through the Barnett formula.
fullfact.org
Scotland will see some benefits with no costs yet they still moan.
Claim by 'facebook user'
You wont have any rail until just before the thing opens... tunnels are being bored, bridges are being made and groundworks assosiated with them in progress, terminals and routes to them are being cleared. Iirc there has been a load of archaeology along the route as well, there has been some pretty interest programs on what they found at various sites including Curzon street.What has actually come of HS2 so far?
Like how much have we spent and how much rail do we have?
Last edited: