Soldato
KNiVES said:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6225286.stm
You seriously want something like THAT in the video games industry? No thanks, I see it as a backwards step. Manhunt isn't a game with substance and depth. You want a decent game with similair stuff and depth, see Fahrenheit or Silent Hill or something.
To take ONE screenshot from a game and base your ENTIRE judgment on IT is crazy.
Grand Theft Auto 1 Anyone?
A procession of buddhists being mowed down by you driving a school bus AND getting BONUS points with some voice shouting "AWESOME" or something similiar.
Im assuming youve played the game and are able to give your opinion based on such experience.
If you are reffering to Manhunt 2, You should try picking up Ngamer and seeing what they think about the game, they are one of the few people whove had the chance to play the game they gave it 92% (WHICH IS THE SAME SCORE THEY GAVE TO THE LEGEND OF ZELDA: THE WIND WAKER) which isnt too bad for a game with "no substance". Far from it, the game does have substance and the developers have worked VERY HARD to create a game which dares to be different. If Daniel Lamb was walking around with several types of guns blowing people to bits with point blank headshots, nothing would have been said.
Im also certain the same people who say the game should be banned are the same ones who say "The Wii is a Kiddies console". I seriously want this game to be released not only because its GOOD but so I can say **** you to anyone who says that again.
Youve never played a violent game and enjoyed it?
ANYWAY - After training on this, im off to America to cut off Jack Thompsons head with a rusty saw, anyone want to join me, you can have the arms and legs
Last edited: